Search for: "Judge v. United States"
Results 6641 - 6660
of 35,340
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2020, 6:55 am
United States v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 6:30 am
There’s truth here, but it’s also worth noting that such arguments can prove too much: why not cities or counties or even smaller units rather than states? [read post]
13 May 2020, 9:30 pm
State judges can and should follow the higher law. [read post]
13 May 2020, 1:32 pm
In the matter, Appeal from the United States Patent and TrademarkOffice, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/001,679, the CAFCfurther expounded on Arthrex.The order given on 13 May 2020 is for further explanation:The Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and Cisco Systems, Inc. have petitioned for rehearing to argue that we erred in extending Arthrex, Inc.v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 8:57 am
The delay contemplated by the United States would cause the continuation of stays in those proceedings and in related proceedings in district courts. [read post]
13 May 2020, 6:20 am
Trump v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 2:03 am
United States, 483 U. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:48 pm
See United States v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:58 pm
Both Jon and Mike referenced the infamous exchange from United States v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:14 pm
Chief Judge Lisa Benner holds a Zoom meeting with Judge Lola Carmichael and other judges who appear from time to time on the show. [read post]
12 May 2020, 5:06 am
Farmer, John, and V. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am
At Dorf on Law, Michael Dorf pushes back against Justice Clarence Thomas’ originalist critique of the First Amendment overbreadth doctrine in a concurrence last week in United States v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:00 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 10:09 am
" The question raised in United States v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 10:06 am
" United States v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 9:29 am
United States is a case about the classification of used clothing coming into the United States.The plaintiff imported bales of used clothing and classified the merchandise in HTSUS item 6309.00.00 as "worn clothing," which is a duty free. [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:07 am
The group also includes the current judge advocate general of the U.K. [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:41 am
Here, the government may still be liable for Theresa=s negligence under the FTCA (28 USC 1346 [b]; Haskin, 569 Fed Appx 12; Esgrance v United States, US Dist Ct, SD NY, 17 Civ 8352, Oetken, J., 2018; Jappa v PJR Const. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am
If the trial judge’s opinion evidences ignorance of the Manual, then at least there is the possibility of an appeal. [read post]
10 May 2020, 9:01 pm
”The appeals court described the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
