Search for: "Blow v. State" Results 661 - 680 of 3,292
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2019, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
They believed federal law supported their case.In a 1978 decision that reverberated across Indian country and beyond, the Supreme Court struck a blow to their efforts by ruling in Oliphant v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Citizens, 1919-1924Conveners: Kenneth Mack, Harvard Law School (kmack@law.harvard.edu), Laurie Wood, Florida State University (lmwood@fsu.edu), Jacqueline Briggs, University of Toronto - Centre for Criminology and Sociolegal Studies (jacq.briggs@mail.utoronto.ca), and John Wertheimer, Davidson College (jow [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 8:54 am by Jonathan Shaub
On Aug. 7, the House Judiciary Committee filed a lawsuit asking a federal court in D.C. to force Don McGahn, former White House counsel, to comply with the committee’s subpoena for his testimony. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
The Sixth Circuit dealt another blow to the EEOC when it affirmed the dismissal of a similar EEOC lawsuit in EEOC v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 1:21 am by Jani Ihalainen
The Court therefore concluded that "…Article 2(c)… must be interpreted as constituting a measure of full harmonisation of the corresponding substantive law".The decision is a big one, and potentially is a big blow to the music industry, but has shown more clarity in the area of quotation. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 1:21 am by Jani Ihalainen
The Court therefore concluded that "…Article 2(c)… must be interpreted as constituting a measure of full harmonisation of the corresponding substantive law".The decision is a big one, and potentially is a big blow to the music industry, but has shown more clarity in the area of quotation. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 7:02 am by Kristian Soltes
Blow to Applicants in UK Class Actions as Mastercard Wins Right to AppealLexology – July 30, 2019 The UK class action regime must take a break whilst the Supreme Court (UKSC) hears the appeal in Merricks v MasterCard concerning the proper approach to certification of a class action. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 10:00 am
The phrase was used in 1964 by United States Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart to describe his threshold test for obscenity in Jacobellis v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
The Information Commissioner’s recent decision will be seen as a blow to the royal family. [read post]
The FCA laws are commonly referred to as “whistleblower laws” because of the direct financial appeal to private citizens to “blow the whistle” to expose otherwise undiscovered proof of improper tax filings. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 3:16 am by SHG
After taking repeated blows, the officer said, Ms. [read post]