Search for: "Gaines v. State"
Results 6781 - 6800
of 9,622
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2022, 4:57 am
With respect to the exculpatory agreement, the Court ruled: Although Adam states, in conclusory fashion, that ‘Libra and Anderson have taken such action in bad faith and intentionally with full knowledge that their action constituted misconduct in knowing violation of the law and for the improper purpose of personally gaining financial profits and advantages to which they are not entitled,’ Adam pleads no facts that would permit such inferences to be drawn. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 2:14 pm
Before last week, I know of no legal authority in the United States who claimed to hold this position. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 4:00 pm
” Apache Corp. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 1:58 pm
Stated another way, Does it make sense to enforce the no-grazing rule — even though it is a perfectly legitimate rule — against this 18-year employee for eating half of a $1.37 bag of potato chips* because her blood sugar was low? [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 10:08 am
At paragraph 7 of its reasons in Lawson v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 9:36 am
[Warning to readers--only peripherally about tax] In January of 2010 in Citizens United v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 11:14 am
Brynwood Company v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 8:17 am
” “New Insights On Privilege, Ethics Duties For In-House Attys” — “In Fischman v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 2:03 pm
Justice Elena Kagan suggested that Salman’s focus on whether the insider receives a pecuniary gain from passing on the information would require the justices “to ignore some extremely specific language in” Dirks v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm
Andrews v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 3:52 pm
United States, 435 U.S. 679, 692 (1978) (test for per se illegality); accord State Oil Co. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 10:11 am
(AP / Times-Picayune / Lambda Legal press release) The case is Adar v. [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 1:42 pm
Dinsmore-Poff v. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 7:00 am
Such a ruling would allow the University . . ., as assignee, to gain access to all patent applications filed by the defendants in the United States Patent and Trademark Office and to take such actions in the Patent Office as might be needed to protect its rights. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
Prince v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 3:52 pm
United States, 435 U.S. 679, 692 (1978) (test for per se illegality); accord State Oil Co. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 3:15 am
Howard v. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 3:25 pm
The issue can be stated simply: did Congress act unconstitutionally in 1996 when it passed a law strictly curbing the power of federal courts to overturn state criminal convictions? [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 12:11 am
Independent claim 1 of each of the higher ranking auxiliary requests III to V contains fewer features and has a broader scope than that of auxiliary request VI.X. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 12:11 am
Independent claim 1 of each of the higher ranking auxiliary requests III to V contains fewer features and has a broader scope than that of auxiliary request VI.X. [read post]
