Search for: "Fair v. State"
Results 7781 - 7800
of 27,417
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2015, 12:26 pm
Ames v. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 9:07 am
The First Department says the employer got a fair trial, though. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 4:30 am
Post 2 (of 2) on Clews v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
"To further confound the situation, Teacher's unsatisfactory year-end performance rating apparently relied on by the Chancellor was ultimately annulled by the Appellate Division in May of 2018 [see Matter of Joyce v City of New York, 161 AD3d 488].Under the circumstances, the Appellate Division said that it found that "good faith and fairness demand that a decision on a request for rescission of resignation pursuant to Chancellor's Regulation C-205(29) be… [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
"The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2018/2018_09018.htm_________________Click here to Read a FREE excerpt from A Reasonable Disciplinary Penalty Under the Circumstances imposed on officers and employees of New York State and its political subdivisions. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 7:42 pm
Synopsys, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2024, 6:39 am
" The cite for that is Rivera v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 8:15 am
In response, the JFTC have stated that they have amended the relevant parts so that the injunctive relief would be considered illegal only under certain circumstances and that they would review each situation on a case-by-case basis, determining whether there is exclusionary conduct or a substantial restraint of competition. [read post]
Employment Agreement Shortening Time for Bringing FLSA and Equal Pay Act Claims Invalidated by Court
16 Aug 2013, 1:03 pm
Specifically, in Boaz v FedEx Customer Information Services, Inc. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
"The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2018/2018_09018.htm_________________Click here to Read a FREE excerpt from A Reasonable Disciplinary Penalty Under the Circumstances imposed on officers and employees of New York State and its political subdivisions. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 11:27 am
See,e.g., United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2021, 3:18 pm
One, Paramount Pictures Corp. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 12:18 pm
In United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2021, 3:18 pm
One, Paramount Pictures Corp. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 12:42 pm
Crawford v. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 12:42 pm
Crawford v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 4:00 am
” In that action the Appellate Division said that the termination of the employee, a NYCTA bus driver for 15 years, with an unblemished record of employment and who had consistently received positive performance evaluations, and had never been disciplined as the sanction “for a single, alleged transgression is grossly excessive and shocks our sense of fairness,” citing Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
30 May 2014, 10:28 am
There is no such claim.The case is Morales v. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 5:42 pm
State v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division rejected the toll collector’s argument that his absences were approved and medically justified and therefore excused for the purposes of maintaining any disciplinary action against him.In Dickinson v New York State Unified Ct. [read post]
