Search for: "COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO." Results 61 - 80 of 163
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2006, 4:35 am
Coca-Cola Femsa, a Mexican bottler partly owned by Atlanta-based Coca-Cola Co., also ran an online ad for a male route driver, aged 25 to 30, at least 5 feet 9 inches tall, between 154 and 176 pounds, with a good presentation. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 1:23 pm
 Check out the next two sentences of the opinion:  "He alleged a single can of Four Loko contained as much alcohol as five to six 12-ounce cans of beer and as much caffeine as approximately four cans of Coca-Cola. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 2:11 pm
At the ACS Blog, Helen Norton has this preview of BCI Coca-Cola Bottling Co v. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 12:17 am
"  (See the majority opinion in The Coca-Cola Co. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 9:03 am
Under the court's reasoning, the Coca-Cola Co. could simply lie about the contents, get consumers' business as a result, and escape liability. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 2:00 am by Guest Blogger
Such is the case with Coca-Cola’s “contour bottle. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 6:44 am by John H Curley
The Court noted that the Eighth Circuit had previously held (in Coca-Cola Bottling Company of St. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 6:08 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
So Coca Cola initiated a contest to identity a unique bottle. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 8:53 am
" The Court went on to reject the Town's claim that it's zoning procedures gave it authority to gather additional environmental information holding instead: "...the EIS 'fully evaluates the potential environmental effects, assesses mitigation measures, and considers alternatives to the proposed action' (Matter of Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of N.Y. v Board of Estimate of City of N.Y., 72 NY2d at 680, citing ECL 8-0109 [4], [2]). [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 1:20 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Coca-Cola Co., 573 U.S. 102 (2014), reasoned that the FDCA and the Lanham Act complemented each other, and market competitors have extra expertise in assessing unfair competition; so too here. [read post]
1 Aug 2020, 5:08 am by Schachtman
Coca Cola Bottling Co., 24 Cal. 2d 453, 150 P.2d 436 (1944) (soft drink bottle); Henningsen v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 5:38 am
District Court in the Northern District of California, against Coca-Cola Co, accusing the company of making false health claims about “Vitaminwater”. [read post]