Search for: "WEAVER v. DOE"
Results 61 - 80
of 309
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2009, 7:59 am
The New York Court of Appeals today decided Weaver v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 5:56 am
People v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 11:44 am
Weaver v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 8:23 am
In contrast to Lee, the Court’s decision last week in Weaver v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 8:23 am
In contrast to Lee, the Court’s decision last week in Weaver v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 8:23 am
In contrast to Lee, the Court’s decision last week in Weaver v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 4:04 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 5:41 am
Weaver, supra (citing Theofel v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 7:33 am
Cir. 1989);Chef America, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 7:00 am
Installing Global Positioning System equipment in devices use by employees during workEl-Nahal v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 6:01 am
She explained that she does not agreed with the standardized test for stare decisis in Chief Justice Kelly’s opinion in Peterson v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:57 am
Weaver, 12 N.Y.3d 433, 882 N.Y.S.2d 357, 909 N.E.2d 1195 (May 12, 2009), posted here, is hard to disagree with, too. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 6:23 pm
Weaver, 99 F.3d 1372, 1377 (6th Cir 1996) (citing Whiteley v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 8:36 am
The 11th Circuit's en banc decision today in Gilbert v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 8:44 am
On July 31, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court issued its opinion in People v. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 6:00 pm
#LINK TO DECISION HERE: Deborah Pusatere v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 11:21 am
So there's at least the possibility of an en banc call, though I think he's probably got more to fear from a reactive Supreme Court -- perhaps assisted by a strongly-worded denial of en banc review -- than he does from the Ninth Circuit taking this one back up. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 8:35 am
Debord v. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 11:43 am
Still, the odd facts of Weaver v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 7:52 am
The Second Circuit held, in accord with several other circuits, that the presumption that an unenhanced lodestar is sufficient does not apply to the award of fees case from a common fund created after a settlement (Isaacson/Weaver Family Trust v. [read post]
