Search for: "Wafer v Wafer" Results 61 - 80 of 102
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2014, 2:25 am
This is what the General Court concluded, referring to Case T-418/07 LIBRO v OHIM – Causley (LiBRO), and confirming the approach adopted in Specsavers. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 6:47 am
The Singapore Court of Appeal in Societe Des Produits Nestlé SA and anor v Petra Foods Limited and anor [2016] SGCA 64 recently affirmed a previous High Court decision that Nestlé’s two-finger and four-finger shape marks (the “Shape Marks”) are not registrable. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
The iconic British chocolate bar has been around since the 1930s, and above all else what many will remember is its shape, comprising of five individual chocolate covered wafer 'fingers' connected at the base by a lawyer of chocolate. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 9:02 am
HOWEVER, an even more interesting story is that of Exxon v. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 2:52 am
A citation now looks something like this: A v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 7:40 am by Shamnad Basheer
 The judgment of the Supreme Court in Chief Election Commissioner v Jan Chaukidar has been criticised by many. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 7:37 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 7,553,777 entitled SILICON WAFER LASER PROCESSING METHOD AND LASER BEAM PROCESSING MACHINE and owned by Disco Corp. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 7:37 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 7,553,777 entitled SILICON WAFER LASER PROCESSING METHOD AND LASER BEAM PROCESSING MACHINE and owned by Disco Corp. [read post]