Search for: "Burns v Burns"
Results 781 - 800
of 4,516
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2022, 3:52 pm
MetroHealth System v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 12:37 pm
Facebook, US v. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 1:47 pm
In Tobe v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 11:42 am
Proler Sawyer v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 8:00 am
Today's case brief is Nelson v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
Blueford v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 6:04 am
" KIVITV reports that: United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 3:30 am
EEOC v. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 12:16 pm
Davis v. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 5:19 am
While the Supreme Court grapples with the issue of who qualifies as a "supervisor" in this context in Vance v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 12:00 pm
One such case is Sergui Tchernykh et al v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 12:00 pm
One such case is Sergui Tchernykh et al v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:05 pm
But the guy's property burned down, the guy was being criminally investigated for arson, and the insurance company was thinking about not paying due to arson.There's no doubt whatsoever in my mind that, on these facts, the insurance company knew full well that there was not only a likelihood of litigation if it denied the claim on the basis of arson, but that there was a super high likelihood of litigation. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 5:12 pm
See, e.g., Bloedorn v. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 9:13 pm
Burns v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 10:59 am
" And saw that it was Judge Burns, who's a smart, and strong-willed, jurist. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 5:42 am
App. 2002); and Valtex, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 4:34 pm
Here is the case citation: Charles v. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 1:04 pm
Burns v. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 8:04 am
"Exemptions are to be narrowly construed to provide maximum access, and the agency seeking to prevent disclosure carries the burden of demonstrating that the requested material falls squarely within a FOIL exemption" (Matter of Capital Newspapers Div. of Hearst Corp. v Burns, 67 NY2d 562, 566 [1986] [citations omitted]; see Matter of Town of Waterford v New York State Dept. of Envtl. [read post]
