Search for: "In Re Sullivan"
Results 781 - 800
of 2,164
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2012, 3:00 am
They’re part of the conversation. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 3:00 am
They’re part of the conversation. [read post]
17 Jun 2007, 10:48 am
The Enron days were elusive, and they’re gone. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 1:35 pm
But we’re still waiting on Sullivan & Cromwell to come in and Bigfoot Cravath. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 8:15 pm
Let me be clear, as a great man says: If you’re using this event to criticize the “rhetoric” of Sarah Palin or others with whom you disagree, then you’re either asserting a connection between the “rhetoric” and the shooting — which based on evidence to date would be what we call a vicious lie — or you’re not, in which case you’re just seizing on a tragedy to try to score unrelated political points, which… [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 6:16 am
But have you ever studied the careers—or better yet the work product—of Maureen Mahoney, Pattie Millett, Kathleen Sullivan, and Virginia Seitz on the appellate side? [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 12:09 pm
If you’re interested in attending this free program, you can register on the event website: https://ibl.law.uiowa.edu/event/uspto-china-intellectual-property-roadshow. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 3:00 pm
I'm not going to re-post his post, but he says, "I think about these issues a lot because the most extreme sentence almost always involve some kind of trial penalty . . . . [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 12:20 pm
In the past year, we found two Cravath lawyers, five Sullivan & Cromwell lawyers, and 11 Davis Polk lawyers whose weddings were announced by The Times. [read post]
17 May 2019, 12:09 pm
”He added, “The [CPLR] statute appears to deny a court any discretion; if you’re dealing with this on appeal, you’re options are going to be limited. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 7:20 am
While suggesting that Sullivan’s opinion was not “bulletproof,” the panel of the Seventh Circuit reversed. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 3:15 am
We’re posting memos in our “Cybersecurity” Practice Area with more detailed advice on what to do right now. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 11:56 am
Otherwise, you’re protected, since the statute did not include any clauses recognizing design defect claims. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 4:30 am
District Judge Richard Sullivan. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 11:27 am
Sullivan, 475 So. 2d 1010 (Fla. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 5:07 am
In re Sullivan, 498F.3d 1345, 1350 (Fed. [read post]
16 May 2014, 8:16 am
(Some informants will get cold feet if they know they’re being filmed, and victims of some crimes may be inhibited from providing testimony.) [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 4:09 am
Mentions FTC order re Google acquisition of Motorola. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 2:37 pm
These surveillance programs are then so shrouded in secrecy that it becomes impossible to know how they’re being used, if they’re effective, or whether they’ve been abused. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 3:28 am
" Makes it sounds like we're making progress. [read post]
