Search for: "Companies A, B, and C"
Results 8501 - 8520
of 12,883
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2012, 8:16 am
(c) This conclusion is not contrary to Wyatt v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 10:29 am
Bailey, Esq., Bailey Kelleher & Johnson PC, Albany, NY Panel: John B. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 8:53 am
Local 87’s members consist mainly of janitorial employees working under contracts between the union and building maintenance companies, which contract with buildings in which the union members work. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 8:39 am
EGCs are exempt from certain regulatory requirements until the earliest of the date (a) five years from the date of their IPO, (b) they have $1 billion in annual gross revenue or (c) they become a large accelerated filer (i.e. a company with worldwide public float of $700 million or more); (ii) While EGCs must comply with SEC-mandated quarterly and annual disclosures,… [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 8:27 am
Image from LinkedIn C&D letters are a sure way to sour a friendship. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 7:39 am
EGCs are exempt from certain regulatory requirements until the earliest of the date (a) five years from the date of their IPO, (b) they have $1 billion in annual gross revenue or (c) they become a large accelerated filer (i.e. a company with worldwide public float of $700 million or more); (ii) While EGCs must comply with SEC-mandated quarterly and annual disclosures,… [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
In the strong form, Chevron would be estopped both to assert that “the judgment was rendered under a judicial system that does not provide impartial tribunals or procedures compatible with the requirements of due process of law” (UFCMJRA § 4(b)(1)) and to assert that “the judgment was obtained by fraud that deprived the losing party of an adequate opportunity to present its case” (UFCMJRA § 4(c)(2)). 2 In the weak form, Chevron would be estopped to… [read post]
14 Apr 2012, 8:18 am
Apparently, the plaintiffs did not provide a substantive response to those concerns, as the Court asserts only that plaintiffs demonstrate “at the very least, an understanding of what certification under 23(b)(2), 23(b)(3), or 23(c)(4) would require…. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 2:13 pm
C. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 11:49 am
The Act defines an EGC as a company with annual gross revenues of less than $1 billion during its most recent fiscal year. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 9:52 am
It was not too long ago that if you whispered the initials “C” “F” “P” “B” to leaders of banks and other financial institutions they would turn ashen-faced and fall into a cold sweat. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 9:24 am
During 240 days, there is no INA 245(c) bar to adjustment of status. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 8:47 am
Didier Madiba, Fenicius LLC., D2011-1954 (WIPO February 4, 2012) (MEDIASET [trademark owned by an Italian television company] and). [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 7:49 am
But, assume the intent requirement isn't there and we're dealing with subsection (a)(2)(C). [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 1:30 am
# Data Breach Class Actions and "Damages" http://t.co/aHLzvMhp # Complimentary Webcast: The Law of Search Meets Computer-Assisted Review http://t.co/0aP7qJnI # Future of Data Breach Class Actions After ‘Anderson’ http://t.co/K7XMaKCE # At Last, the EU Cookies Regulation Is Implemented in Spain – This blog post was provided by Pablo Rivas in our Madri… http://t.co/NNOE09Sh # 10 Reasons Why Facebook Bought Instagram – Why would Facebook pay $1 billion for a… [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 7:07 pm
§ 1030 (a)(2)(C)(c)(B)(iii), and whether the district court had abused its discretion in ordering restitution in the amount of $47,565. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 5:51 am
This is because the MD is a director but also an employee of the company. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 5:44 am
Or is used in transporting material found by the Secretary of Transportation to be hazardous (under 49 U.S.C. 5103) and transported in a quantity requiring placarding under regulations (prescribed by the Secretary under 49 CFR, subtitle B, chapter I, subchapter C). [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 2:28 am
Indeed, Solvay sued the Dutch and two Belgian companies for the infringement of their European patent (EP) in all countries in which the EP was valid, claiming that all three companies infringed the EP with the same product in all those countries. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 11:48 am
Item 13 of Form D requires that a company specify: the total amount of securities to be offered (Item 13(a)), expressed as a dollar value or as an “Indefinite” amount (indicating that the total offering amount is undetermined or cannot be determined at the time of the Form D filing); the total amount of securities that have been sold as of the time of the Form D filing (Item 13(b)); and the total amount of securities that remain to be sold (Item… [read post]
