Search for: "JOHNSON v. SHORT"
Results 861 - 880
of 1,142
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2020, 8:42 am
In a short statement joined by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sotomayor explained that Patrick’s case involved the same question on which she had previously dissented from the denial of review: whether defendants sentenced under mandatory sentencing guidelines can rely on the court’s 2015 decision in Johnson v. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm
In short, that nothing will change. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:19 am
Johnson says. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 8:22 am
It was misguided and short lived. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 9:22 am
The dissent further argued that there was no reason to overrule Johnson. [read post]
25 May 2018, 6:41 am
It’s curious when cases that have been relisted as many as ten times are denied review without even a short statement respecting denial. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
A natural-gas pipeline exploded in Johnson County, Texas, on June 7, 2010. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 1:41 pm
1-800-411-Pain Referral Service, LLC v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 5:00 am
The executive summaries of Volumes I and II are short, clear, and illuminating. [read post]
4 May 2010, 12:59 am
” Modern politicians ‘as ego driven’ as the Romans This short discussion between a professor of classics and Boris Johnson is rather good, Terror suspects’ wives win European court ruling on state handouts Times: Curbs on state handouts to wives of terrorist suspects were ruled illegal yesterday by European judges and may have to be relaxed. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 5:36 pm
Seller’s Disclosure A leading case of Johnson v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 5:00 pm
"Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 2:59 pm
See, e.g., Lockheed Martin Corp. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
Weiler (2009) for their help in preparing this short paper and their future assistance on what will be a much more in depth study of these issues. 1 states. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 9:47 am
State v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:54 pm
Consider, for example, Riggs v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 6:05 am
District Court (Eastern District of Michigan) in the King v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:12 pm
IN ADMIRALTY FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW RE EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON MAINTENANCE AND CURE This matter came on for an evidentiary hearing, before the Court, sitting without a jury, on May 14, 2015. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 11:52 am
” Hill v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
[11] The action against BP (“the BP case”) contains the following conclusions, read short: Count and reckoning of BP’s intromissions from 1 March 2006 to 31 July 2006 with HC’s funds received into its client account, and payment of any balance due. [read post]
