Search for: "Cornell Law Review"
Results 881 - 900
of 1,994
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2022, 6:45 am
Immigration System (National Immigrant Justice Center, Dec. 2022) [text]"Here’s Your Number, Now Please Wait in Line: The Asylum Backlog, Federal Court Litigation, and Artificial Intelligence in Agency Adjudication," Univ. of Chicago Law Review, vol. 89, no. 8 (2022) [full-text]- Focuses on the US.Web3 and communities at risk: Myths and problems with current experiments (Minderoo Centre for Technology and Democracy, Nov. 2022) [text]Multimedia:When AI is managing… [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
Policies Punish Refugees at the Border (Human Rights First Blog, Feb. 2024) [text]USCIS Reduces Its Backlog for the First Time in Years (Immigration Impact Blog, Feb. 2024) [text]Reports & journal articles:"Dismantling the Due Process Dichotomy in Crimmigration Cases," Cornell International Law Journal, vol. 56 (Forthcoming, 2024) [preprint]How Americans View the Situation at the U.S. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 7:51 am
Back in January 2018, in a post titled Harvard Law Grad Scaramucci Botches Law Discussing Trump-McGahn Discussion of Mueller , Ronn Blitzer (apparently a graduate of Cornell Law) wrote:Enter Walter Shaub. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 7:47 am
Supreme Court practice, and her work has been published in a variety of outlets, including the Northwestern Law Review, the Emory Law Journal, the University of Illinois Law Review, and the Minnesota Law Review. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 3:30 am
Schmidt Law and History Review’s recently published symposium, Originalism and Legal History: Rethinking the Special Relationship, offers a fascinating collection of articles, some by familiar commentators on constitutional originalism, some by newer voices. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 7:58 pm
The case is Save the Agoura Cornell Knoll v. [read post]
29 Apr 2017, 5:19 pm
The call was made after Murdoch’s sons reviewed the details of the internal investigation. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:02 am
Madeline Horn and Conley Wouters preview the case for Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 4:01 am
Amanda Wong and Jared Ham have a preview at Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court granted review in a case about the meaning of the Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm
On 27 January 2020 the Government published its response to the Cairncross Review on its website. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:41 am
And, if lawyers are honest, they'll admit that more often than not they'll turn to blogs for an easy to understand analysis of a case or statute before turning to a law review article or hell, even before reading the case or statute itself. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
Stevens Professor of Law at Cornell University and co-author, most recently, of Beating Hearts: Abortion and Animal Rights. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 3:55 pm
Schwab and Cornell Law Professor Kevin M. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 12:29 pm
Like Kathryn, Angela donates her time to the Cornell Law Review. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 12:35 pm
(If you're interested in reading our legal arguments in more detail, including a review of relevant patent case law that Sandra outlined in the hearing, take a look at our motion for summary judgment.) [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 4:14 am
Amy Howe previewed the case for this blog; another preview comes from Emily Rector and Kimberly Petrick at Cornell University Law School’s Legal Information Institute. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 6:00 am
Grossman’s many articles have appeared in journals such as Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law & Ethics; Cornell Law Review; and Law and History Review. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm
Nonetheless, a Supreme Court decision to grant review and rule for Cressman could—depending on how the opinion is written—hold the potential to undermine anti-discrimination law. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 9:01 pm
In a 2007 article in the Harvard Law & Policy Review, I hypothesized that as Supreme Court decisions became more politically salient to their constituents, Republican Presidents got better at screening out potential evolvers by nominating people they knew to be reliable conservatives because the nominees were familiar to the Republican legal establishment based on service in the executive branch of the federal government. [read post]
