Search for: "Manufacturing Company v. United States"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 3,131
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2012, 8:36 am
The Mag-Lite trademark was registered with the United States Patent Trademark Office in 1979. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 8:36 am
The Mag-Lite trademark was registered with the United States Patent Trademark Office in 1979. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 2:59 pm
Eskimo Pie became a subsidiary of United States Foil Company, the supplier of the Eskimo Pie wrapper. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 6:13 pm
The case is significant in that, for now, despite the long-standing rule to the contrary in the seminal United States Supreme Court case of Hanover Shoe v. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 6:13 pm
The case is significant in that, for now, despite the long-standing rule to the contrary in the seminal United States Supreme Court case of Hanover Shoe v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:16 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 9:51 am
In Booth Family Trust v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 9:30 am
” Eventually, New Coke was renamed “Coke II” and is, according to Coca-Cola Company itself, no longer available in the United States. [read post]
3 Nov 2019, 3:58 am
Registering your IP in the United States or the EU or Australia or any other country does not provide you with IP protection in China. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 9:18 am
However, the Court heard that Smash EDO’s object was to close down the activities in the United Kingdom of a US-owned arms manufacturer company with a factory in Brighton. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 11:36 pm
Tessera designs semiconductors, and thereby manufactures patent litigations. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 4:43 am
’ However, the Dictionary Act, 1 U.S Code § 1, which defines terms used in the United States Code `unless the context indicates otherwise,’ specifies that the word `person’ includes `corporations, companies, associations, firms, partnerships, societies, and joint stock companies, as well as individuals. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Surgidev Corp., 899 P.2d 576, 591 (N.M. 1995) (“evidence of compliance with FDA regulations was properly submitted to the jury for consideration”); United Blood Services v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 1:43 pm
Recently, in Karlo v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 9:29 am
See United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 6:43 am
Various companies — Caterpillar, Inc., Aurora Pump Co., Innophos, Inc., Rockwell Automation, Inc., United States Steel Corp., F.H. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 12:36 pm
The United States Supreme Court held long ago, in the 1902 case of Minder v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 7:00 am
Along with their direct employer, they sued Allied Van Lines (which had an agency relationship with the moving company) and its parent company (Griffin v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 1:03 pm
See Barnes v. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 10:39 am
Supreme Court in Morrison v. [read post]
