Search for: "Mr. X" Results 1141 - 1160 of 2,306
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2013, 12:19 pm
 Mr Justice Birss commented: "If it is not a relevant factor, then not. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
This is a noteworthy decision on search-related matters.The application under consideration was filed as a PCT application with the USPTO in 2005. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:48 am by Schachtman
Butler’s opinion was simple if not simpistic: “there is a ‘reasonable medical probability that there is a direct causal association between Mr. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 3:04 pm by Giles Peaker
Mr X lived there alone. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 3:04 pm by Giles Peaker
Mr X lived there alone. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 2:56 am by Peter Mahler
Ergo, if plaintiff’s shares are currently worth “x”, but defendants’ improper actions caused the shares to lose “y” in value, the could would award plaintiff “x” plus “y”. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 5:40 am
All went well until X encountered trading difficulties and entered liquidation. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 6:16 pm
Just as the Supreme Court applied the experimental-use exception when Mr. [read post]