Search for: "Doe v. The Trump Corporation"
Results 101 - 120
of 889
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
Court of Appeal to determine whether the Taylor Law trumps Second Class Cities Law with respect to negotiating police disciplinary proceduresAppeal of Matter of City of Schenectady v New York State Pub. [read post]
9 May 2018, 11:21 am
Condominium Corporation, No. [read post]
9 May 2018, 11:21 am
Condominium Corporation, No. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 11:25 am
A failure to investigate, carelessness, or even ordinary negligence does not suffice. [read post]
11 Dec 2024, 12:01 pm
In the remedies phase of the landmark U.S. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2025, 1:35 pm
Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 6:59 am
Hobby Lobby Stores and Conestoga Wood Specialties v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 6:47 am
In her practice, she represents primarily employees, though she does represent employers as well. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
Beyond one-time events, the state has suffered the losses from corporate relocations—including PayPal, Deutsche Bank, and the Lionsgate film studio. [read post]
25 Sep 2022, 12:23 am
Schwartz, Sabastian V. [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 9:43 am
The Executive Orders also direct Federal agencies to “identify up to nine potential civil compliance investigations of publicly traded corporations, large non-profit corporations or associations, foundations with assets of 500 million dollars or more, State and local bar and medical associations, and institutions of higher education with endowments over 1 billion dollars. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 3:31 pm
Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:37 pm
Neil Richards has dissected the flaws in Volokh's Lochneresque effort to reduce the complex societal dynamics of fair data practices to Hohfeldian trump cards held by individuals and corporations. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 8:29 am
The US Supreme Court held today that the Credit Repair Organizations Act (CROA) does not trump the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) requirement that an arbitration agreement must be enforced according to its terms. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am
Here are a few preliminary thoughts about the Court’s decision yesterday in Trump v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 7:43 am
If so, what does this mean for corporate lawyers? [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:27 am
Fortunately for the IPKat, guidance came in the form of a note from his friend Gill Grassie (Maclay Murray & Spens LLP) on a hot topic that pits copyight against some countervailing public interests: the decision of Lord Woolman, sitting in the Court of Session, in Petition by the British Broadcasting Corporation for Access to Crown Productions in the case of Her Majesty's Advocate v Kimberley Mary Hainey (which you can read in full here). [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 5:11 pm
The always-worth-reading David Luban posts his thoughts about Padilla v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 8:00 am
Apple Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 4:23 am
In another opinion issued on Wednesday, Life Technologies Corporation v. [read post]
