Search for: "Persons v. Cochran" Results 101 - 120 of 203
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2014, 10:35 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Authored by Seyfarth Shaw LLP By Michele Haydel Gehrke In a decision significant for employers with Bring Your Own Device (“BYOD”) policies, a California Court of Appeal held in Cochran v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 7:32 am
That person’s exemption claim is judged — and should be judged — without regard to whether the rest of the person’s religious beliefs are considered good or bad. * * * Generally, our legal system has long reached sensible results when it comes to accommodating religious believers. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 12:30 pm
” In the leading case of Cochrane v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 11:07 am by Jeff Gamso
  And of course, being a crazy person made him dangerous. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 11:00 am by Kevin Noonan
  This reasoning can be seen in early cases, such as the Wood-Paper Patent cases, and Cochrane v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 10:40 am by Schachtman
The plaintiffs maintained that Professor Wei’s meta-analyses should be excluded under Rule 702, or the New York case law, because of inclusion of short-term clinical trials failure to weight risk ratios by person years inclusion of zero-event trials with use of imputation methods use of risk difference instead of risk ratios use of exact confidence intervals instead of estimated intervals See generally Plaintiffs’ Memorandum of Law in Support of Their Motion to Exclude… [read post]