Search for: "Persons v. Cochran"
Results 101 - 120
of 203
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2014, 1:09 pm
In Cochran v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 10:35 am
Authored by Seyfarth Shaw LLP By Michele Haydel Gehrke In a decision significant for employers with Bring Your Own Device (“BYOD”) policies, a California Court of Appeal held in Cochran v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 1:41 pm
The issue in a recent case, Cochran v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 6:06 pm
Goodman v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 3:43 pm
PatinoState v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 8:19 am
The cases are Riley v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 7:32 am
That person’s exemption claim is judged — and should be judged — without regard to whether the rest of the person’s religious beliefs are considered good or bad. * * * Generally, our legal system has long reached sensible results when it comes to accommodating religious believers. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 9:23 am
In Fair v. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 12:30 pm
” In the leading case of Cochrane v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 9:00 am
Castle Megastore Group, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 11:07 am
And of course, being a crazy person made him dangerous. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 11:00 am
This reasoning can be seen in early cases, such as the Wood-Paper Patent cases, and Cochrane v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 7:59 am
In Cochrane v. [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 3:26 pm
In Goodman v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 3:19 am
Read on for a recap of the TPIR lawsuit . . .Brandi Cochran v. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 3:15 am
[Eagan, Minn.] : West, 2012 v. ; 26 cm. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 1:52 pm
In the case, Monday v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 10:40 am
The plaintiffs maintained that Professor Wei’s meta-analyses should be excluded under Rule 702, or the New York case law, because of inclusion of short-term clinical trials failure to weight risk ratios by person years inclusion of zero-event trials with use of imputation methods use of risk difference instead of risk ratios use of exact confidence intervals instead of estimated intervals See generally Plaintiffs’ Memorandum of Law in Support of Their Motion to Exclude… [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 2:57 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 1:50 am
Stephen Lynn Cochran, No. [read post]