Search for: "U. S. v. Session" Results 101 - 120 of 346
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2016, 3:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
On April 24, 2013, petitioner received a revised U-Rating that changed the date of the principal's and district superintendent's signatures to April 22, 2013.The Department of Education discontinued petitioner's probationary employment as of May 29, 2013, a month before the school year ended. [read post]
21 May 2014, 4:46 am
The May 15, 2009 meeting at which the government imaged Scott's computers was the eighth of eighteen serial proffer sessions in which Scott participated. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:15 am by Laura Sandwell
PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v SSHD, W & BB v SSHD and Z, G, U & Y v SSHD, heard 30 – 31 January 2012. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 9:01 am by Tejinder Singh
Department of Justice, and then became an assistant U. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 11:28 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
The Union of India challenged the award u/s 34 of the Indian Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (1996 Act), which was dismissed as Part I, including S. 34, was not applicable since the place of arbitration was Kuala Lumpur. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 11:26 pm by Robert B. Milligan
The Act is intended to strengthen the scope of the Economic Espionage Act to prevent results like the Second Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 3:00 am
Claudia Seitz (U of Basle) opened the afternoon session with a presentation on data exclusivity and marketing protection, followed by Alesch Staehelin exploring the legal implications of the “internet of health(care) things”. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
 Since Justice Stevens announced his retirement on Friday, effective at the close of this session of the Court in June, President Obama's second high-court nomination takes on critical importance in the Perry case. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 Since Justice Stevens announced his retirement on Friday, effective at the close of this session of the Court in June, President Obama's second high-court nomination takes on critical importance in the Perry case. [read post]