Search for: "U.S. Steel Group v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 259
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2017, 10:32 am by Schachtman
Wells had no protocol, no pre-stated commitment to which years in the dataset he would use, and no pre-stated statistical analysis plan. [read post]
17 May 2017, 9:35 pm by William Funk
That legislative intent was given effect by the Supreme Court in its seminal cases of United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 3:07 am
Unigate Enterprise, Inc, United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, Nos. 14-16701, 9 February 2017A seller of computer aided design (CAD) files used for steel detailing services could have infringed a software provider’s CAD program by downloading an unauthorized copy of the program, the U.S. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:40 am
" (Recommendation p. 10).If that is what the Ethics Council is suggesting, it presents an interesting and useful application of the 2nd Pillar of the United Nations Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights (corporate responsibility to respect human rights) to enterprises independent of their legal obligations under the more formally legal 2st Pillar state duty to protect human rights. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 6:06 am
The group in the park noted the officers' presence. [read post]
26 May 2015, 8:57 am by WIMS
United States Fish & Wildlife – 5/26/15. [read post]