Search for: "United States, v. Duncan" Results 101 - 120 of 368
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2017, 10:27 am by Molly Runkle
Addressing the first accusation, Maynard argued that the Sisters’ prophesying activity was protected by the First Amendment. (11th century Scottish law here looks remarkably similar to that of the 21st century United States.) [read post]
11 Jun 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The Socially Aware blog had a post on regulatory developments affecting social media use  in the United States. [read post]
9 May 2017, 6:20 am by Peter Margulies
The Constitution generally does not protect noncitizens abroad who have no previous ties to the United States. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am by SHG
Marginal income tax rates in the mid-1980s were 70 percent on so-called unearned income, plus a few more percent tacked on by the states. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Legal Beagle
  As summarised in an Isle of Man judgment, the scheme resembled a “Ponzi” scheme in that apparent repayments to HC were in fact funded in a circular way by HC itself:  see paragraph 30 of the judgment of His Honour Deemster Corlett, Heather Capital Limited v KPMG Audit LLC, 17 November 2015. [9]        A third party, Nicholas Levene, was a participant in the scheme. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 9:06 am by Schachtman
The Noerr-Pennington Doctrine of Immunity One of the first agenda items for the first United States Congress was the drafting of a “Bill of Rights” to be submitted to the individual States for ratification. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:47 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
McDonald (by her litigation friend Duncan J McDonald) v McDonald & Ors, heard 15–16 March 2016. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
On 10 May 2016, HHJ Moloney QC heard applications in the cases of Ghuman v Ghuman and Hussain v Feeney. [read post]
1 May 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Surveillance and Information Gathering Britain is responding to the threat of terrorism in ways that could well increase global insecurity, argues Jane Duncan for OpenDemocracy. [read post]