Search for: "Boring v. State" Results 1181 - 1200 of 1,708
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2008, 2:36 am
Icaza, 492 F.3d 967 (8th Cir. 2007), and United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 7:00 am by Victor Rivera Jr.
(Indeed, in this case the Board had also brought fraud and negligence claims directly against the Architect, clearly indicated that it believed that the Architect bore some fault for the state of the development.) [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
” Winder states: Charles X may have been stupid, vengeful and incompetent, but he was the rightful King of France. [read post]
16 May 2011, 11:42 am by Steve McConnell
We will say only a little about one of those soggy cases.In Rikos v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 8:00 am
In those two cases, none of the patent-holders contributed anything to the economic development of the highly profitable products that were created by thousands of other people and the amount of money demanded as damages in those two cases bore no reasonable relationship to the inventor's alleged contribution to those products.The Eolas and Blackberry cases are prime evidence of patent law run wild - a development which has not escaped the notice of the US Supreme Court, whose decision… [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 5:40 am
  It seems that the plea coercion bug has migrated north, according to this post from the NY Criminal Defense Blog, with the Fourth Department reversal in People v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 5:24 am by SHG
Nehls did give lip service to the 1971 Supreme Court decision[5] that stated that a jacket in a courtroom that bore the message “F**k the Draft” did not disturb the peace or lead to violence, but still wants to get the message changed. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am by John Elwood
United States, 15-802, reminds us that the Federal Circuit doesn’t just decide boring patent cases all day: It also resolves dull claims against the federal government! [read post]