Search for: "Quick v. United States"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 2,424
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2017, 10:17 am
“Does it matter that most innovative activity, at least in the United States, is taking place in a small number of venture capital funded locations? [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 11:47 pm
Of the text, researchers at different universities weren't quick to share ideas one merely has to recall the underlying issue in the Supreme Court caseMerck v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 11:40 am
READ PARTS I-V (pp. 101-138 in SSRN version). [read post]
2 May 2021, 9:59 am
Did any lawyers for the United States approve the timing of the condemnation action? [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 4:05 am
Forest Service v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 1:49 pm
United States, arguing that the majority took too narrow a view of Congress’s Article I authority over military commissions. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
23 Dec 2017, 5:15 pm
Scott Anderson flagged his Lawfare@FP piece on the ambiguity in Trump’s announcement that that United States will recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 12:52 pm
The Florida Supreme Court decided that the fee limiting statute was unconstitutional under both Florida’s Constitution and the United States Constitution. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 7:26 am
Rule 702 should have settled the debate over Daubert, as this rule for the admissibility of expert testimony is far stricter than any rule that existed in any jurisdiction in the United States before Daubert came out. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 5:21 pm
Canton v. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 12:57 am
In Sutcliffe v Secretary of State for Education [2024] EWHC 1878 (Admin), Pepperall J commenced his judgment as follows: “[1]. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 11:39 am
United States 526 U.S. 227 (1999) where Kennedy is interpreting a piece of federal criminal legislation, and he finds that “there is some significance in the use of the active voice in the main paragraph and the passive voice in clauses (2) and (3) of §2119. [read post]
16 May 2008, 1:58 pm
A quick search does not turn up any reference to Supreme Court's 2005 Roper decision about juveniles being ineligibility for the death penalty in the United States. [read post]
18 May 2007, 10:58 am
My friends cut-and-paste allow a quick summary from the Eighth Circuit's official opinion page:062965P.pdf 05/18/2007 United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
Article III provides that federal courts may hear “cases” and “controversies,” including “all cases, in law and equity, arising under . . . the laws of the United States . . . . [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 3:42 pm
On Monday, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 8:23 am
United States, No. 06-5618 (cert. granted, Nov. 3, 2006); and Rita v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 10:01 am
See United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 4:05 pm
United States (District Court docket 11-1303). [read post]
