Search for: "Does 1-29"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 12,900
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2008, 6:16 am
The information above can be found at 29 USC § 213(a)(1) and 29 C.F.R. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 7:15 am
The regulations (at 29 C.F.R. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 7:16 am
In decision T 272/95 (relating to what has become Rule 29(1) EPC) the Board,too, fully acknowledged the Administrative Council’s competence to give “amore detailed interpretation of the meaning of Article 53 EPC”.4 On this basisthe Board examined under Article 164(2) EPC the validity of the new Rule withArticle 53(a) EPC in assessing whether it was “in conformity with said Article”(emphasis added). [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 5:00 pm
Health Care Reform/Medicaid Service Fees: HHS PROPOSES PAY BOOST FOR MEDICAID DOCTORS, 14 No. 24 Westlaw Journal Nursing Home 6, Westlaw Journal Nursing Home June 1, 2012 Primary care physicians could see a pay raise in the next two years for treating Medicaid patients under a rule proposed May 9 by the Obama administration. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 7:02 am
How long does a divorce take? [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 12:33 am
This corresponds to the general disclosure of the present application concerning the hydrodeoxygenation of an oxygenate feedstock of biological origin (page 1, lines 9 to 10, page 2, lines 29 to 31, page 3, lines 9 to 11), pa [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 4:29 am
Article 45 in conjunction with Art. 34 point 1. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:40 pm
The first federal minimum wage, set October 29, 1938, was $.25 per hour. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 1:59 pm
The judge begins the opinion by explaining that[t]he defendant was charged with aggravated harassment in the second degree in violation of Penal Law Section 240.30(1)(a) alleged to have occurred on August 29, 2016. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 3:30 am
And that is in Section 4(a)(1) of the ADEA. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 11:25 am
Date: 10/7/2008 1:59 PMBy ANDALE GROSSAssociated Press WriterKANSAS CITY, Mo. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 6:56 am
However, a "safe harbor" regulation, at 29 C.F.R. 2510.3-2(f), prevents coverage for a 403(b) plan funded solely by salary reduction contributions, if the following four conditions are met: (1) participation of employees is completely voluntary, (2) all rights under the plan are enforceable solely by the employee, (3) the involvement of the employer is limited to certain specified activities, and (4) the employer receives no direct or indirect compensation, other than… [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 5:38 am
The Court noted that the FMLA does not explicitly grant plaintiffs the right to front pay, so that any award of front pay would be provided only under the section of the FMLA which grants prospective equitable relief (29 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 4:16 am
In re Texas With Love, LLC, Serial No. 87793802 (October 29, 2020) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Michael B. [read post]
27 May 2015, 6:00 am
On August 29 Smith wrote the Division "seeking to withdraw and rescind" his resignation. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 1:59 am
USDA does NOT object to such disclaimers. [read post]
21 May 2019, 8:03 am
Justice Kagan, for an 8-1 majority, wrote a very interesting and readable decision. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 10:53 pm
29 C.F.R. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
This view was confirmed by the decision of the RS of May 29, 2012, in which it was stated that, according to R 36(1) EPC, an applicant could only file a divisional application “relating to any pending earlier European patent application”. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 2:03 pm
And lo, Connell almost does. [read post]
