Search for: "Does 1-96" Results 1281 - 1300 of 2,165
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2013, 9:12 am by Schachtman
., CV 94-P-14229-S, Transcript at 96-98, N.D. [read post]
15 May 2013, 9:33 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
’”) Accordingly, we sustain the rejection of claims 1-67, 69-89, and 91-96 as unpatentable over Kuechler and Miller.Even when ExxonMobil won on a point, the bigger battle was still lost:Although Patent Owner persuades us that the stated rationale forcombining Mulvaney and Kuechler is insufficient, it has failed to persuadeus that the claims are patentable over Mulvaney and Jorgensen. [read post]
12 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Also the appellants submitted that due to a “release” of the activity of the original substance to the diluent during the multiple dilutions, the diluent of the dilutions referred to in claim 1 has properties which the undiluted diluent does not have. [read post]
7 May 2013, 10:30 pm by Tony Corbo
The headline of the Department’s January 20, 2012 news release published when Secretary Tom Vilsack announced his intent to propose a rule that would privatize poultry inspection stated: USDA Seeks to Modernize Poultry Inspection in the United States Inspection would focus on areas most critical to ensuring food safety, save taxpayers more than $90 million over three years and lower production costs by more than $256 million annually (1) Straight from the horse’s mouth. [read post]
7 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
It is to be noted in this context that this assertion does not correspond to the content of the client’s letter because it does not contain any indications on the scope of the patent protection to be obtained […]. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 10:46 am by Sara Hutchins Jodka
In Design Technology Group LLC dba Bettie Page Clothing (Case No. 20-CA-035511, 359 NLRB No. 96), the Board found that the employer, a clothing store, violated Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) by discharging three employees for engaging in what the Board deemed protected concerted activity after the employees posted messages on Facebook complaining about their working conditions. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
A 100 does not state that it is a ground of revocation that the patent was granted on a divisional application whose subject-matter as filed extended beyond the content of the earlier application as filed. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 2:54 am by Peter Mahler
Since the complaint does not set forth a specific or even a reasonably certain termination date, it does not satisfy the “definite term” element of section 62 (1) (b). [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm by Bexis
  Beyond observing that the white box was about the same size as the silver object, [plaintiff mother] does not recall whether the box had been opened or any markings on the box. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In its letter the applicant mentions a request to delete dependent claims 2, 3, and 4 and provides arguments why the examiner should reconsider this request.Claims 1 to 4 on file read:1. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm by oliver randl
G 1/05 [11.1] and T 600/08 [2.3]. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm by oliver randl
Decision T 65/96 does not help the appellant’s position, because in addition to the reference to previous statements, three specific points made in the decision under appeal were contested. [1.4] A further argument advanced by the appellant rests upon a passage in the decision T 644/97 [1] according to which an appellant cannot be compelled to come up with new arguments (“Indeed, a requirement that new arguments must be submitted to render an appeal admissible… [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 12:31 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
As science journal budgets go up, strapped libraries spend less on monograph, so the ave. run is now 300 copies, $96. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm by oliver randl
During this conversation the drawing referred to as D8 (drawing EKM-Ps-96/08 with handwritten remarks) was used as a basis for the discussions with Seondo. [read post]