Search for: "US v. Butts" Results 121 - 140 of 659
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2017, 12:13 pm
Judge Tallman says in a footnote:"Here, Butte County distinguishes between solicited and unsolicited mail because unsolicited mail is far more likely to be used to undermine institutional security than solicited mail. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 3:59 pm
  But only in the same way North Vietnam subsequently beat us. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 9:26 am by Jason Shinn
Here is something you don’t see happen everyday – an instance of “butt dialing” becoming a federal case. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 8:16 am by Courtney Bowman
” The Sixth Circuit remanded the case to the district court to determine whether the assistant’s actions qualified as “intentional use of a device” to intercept the Chairman’s wife’s oral communications. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 8:27 pm
Then again, what's this got to do with Watters v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 11:04 am by Eric
Believe it or not, this is not the first opinion in Westlaw to use the term "Cornholio"--that "honor" is reserved for State v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 2:09 pm
 I'm a little worried about incentivizing Attorney to lie in the underlying litigation in order to cover his own butt. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:12 pm
  Though I don't think that even the avant-garde Netflix is going to use the whole "sex in the butt to bring 'em back to life, just in case" theory.)Yet, still, the guy's 74 years old at this point. [read post]