Search for: "State v. Governor" Results 1441 - 1460 of 6,540
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2020, 12:12 pm
First, Article V, Subsection 11(c) states that "[t]he governor shall make the appointment within sixty days after the nominations have been certified to the governor. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 1:05 pm by Tim McMahan
State Energy Facility Siting Council and Governor Gregoire, et. al., No. 88089-1. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 12:00 am by Camille V. Otero and Susanne Peticolas
The following day, the governor signed Executive Order 103, declaring a Public Health Emergency and State of Emergency. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 11:56 am by Daniel S. Blynn
However, lest we forget, states have telemarketing laws as well and, this week, Florida Governor Rick Scott signed into law Senate Bill 568, which explicitly sweeps ringless voicemail technology within the state’s law. [read post]
30 May 2014, 6:36 am by Jeff Welty
Earlier this week, I blogged about Hall v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 2:29 am by sally
Supreme Court HM Treasury v Ahmed & Ors [2010] UKSC 5 (04 February 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Hancox & Anor v R. [2010] EWCA Crim 102 (04 February 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Perinpanathan, R (on the application of) v City of Westminster Magistrates Court & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 40 (04 February 2010) The Port of London Authority v Ashmore [2010] EWCA Civ 30 (04 February 2010) Republic of Argentina v NML Capital Ltd… [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 7:52 am by Tom Thornburg
The law makes wide ranging changes to the state’s criminal law and procedure, including adjustments to satellite-based monitoring based on Grady v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 3:20 am by Scott Bomboy
“This Court cannot countenance a claim by the Governor and Legislature of a State that there is no duty on state officials to obey federal court orders resting on this Court's considered interpretation of the United States Constitution in Brown v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
That was the knock, of course, on the infamous (and thoroughly discredited) Bush v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 5:51 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  Adopt the rule endorsed by a plurality of the Supreme Court in Kuhlmann v. [read post]