Search for: "Thomas J. Brennan" Results 141 - 160 of 171
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
Ryan (Associate Professor, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) and Thomas J. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 5:55 am by Helen White
Since the Supreme Court took the case in June, the respondents have added the revered retired conservative court of appeals judge J. [read post]
28 May 2020, 9:05 pm by Max Masuda-Farkas
” President Donald J. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) I thought I’d pass along two briefs that the UCLA First Amendment Amicus Brief Clinic has filed in the last few weeks. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
(Here I distinguish the preservative conservativism of Justices Harlan, the early Blackmun, Powell, O’Connor, Kennedy, and Souter from the counter-revolutionary or movement conservatism of Justices Scalia, Thomas, and Alito.) [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am by Schachtman
“For the rational study of the law the blackletter man may be the man of the present, but the man of the future is the man of statistics and the master of economics. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Brennan, that the right of privacy was a right of individuals, married or not. [read post]
10 May 2011, 1:46 pm by admin
“The exemptions [for churches have continued uninterrupted to the present day," Justice William Brennan has said. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 6:07 am by Jim Sedor
The Office of Campaign and Political Finance said J. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 5:57 am by Eugene Volokh
Washington state criminalizes (among other things) “mak[ing] an electronic communication to … a third party” “with intent to harass, … torment, or embarrass any other person” if the communication is made “[a]nonymously or repeatedly. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
Brennan’s aggressive liberalism, Scalia’s insistent originalism. [read post]