Search for: "US v. David Alexander"
Results 161 - 180
of 394
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2018, 7:08 am
’” Alexander Bolton of The Hill reports that “Democrats say the prospect that the Senate will confirm a Trump nominee who could overturn the Roe v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:32 am
Valentin Vandendaele at Leiden Law Blog describes – and advocates – use of the efficiency gap to measure partisan gerrymandering, which the court declined to do this term in Gill v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 11:38 am
In Alexander v. [read post]
9 Jun 2018, 11:15 am
Milward v. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 9:26 pm
According to David Herbert Donald in his classic book Lincoln Reconsidered: Essays on the Civil War Era, Welles was summoned to the White House to meet with Raymond and Lincoln. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 4:22 am
” At Take Care, David Gans weighs in on Trump v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
An injunction, on the other hand, would be a useful remedy, because even judgment-proof speakers are not jail-proof. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
The court also noted that an appellate court in Wisconsin had rejected Alexander’s theory, in construing a similar statute in State v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:30 pm
" ICYMI: Andrew Porwancher, Oklahoma Law, on The Jewish Founding Father: Alexander Hamilton’s Hidden Life. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 12:45 am
| Bad faith confirmed for ALEXANDER trade mark application? [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 10:27 am
Rickless, Maimon Schwarzschild, William Voegeli, Larry Alexander, 54 San Diego Law Review 197-341 (2017).Gerard V. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 4:41 am
Katfriend David Barron dwelt upon the issue in light of the judgement TQ Delta v Zyxel [2017] EWHC 3305 (Pat) in Trial sequence in SEP litigation - time for a rejig? [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 4:00 pm
” In the same publication, Attorney Alyson Clair Decker reviews You Don’t Own Me: How Mattel v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 3:55 am
For the Tribune News Service (via Governing), David Savage reports that in District of Columbia v. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 1:46 pm
Brainchild: Loving v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 7:50 am
David does not expect there to be a huge rush to file newly-developed marks, because certification marks have two key limitations: (i) the proprietor of the mark is not itself able to use the mark in relation to the goods/services for which it is registered; and (ii) indications of geographical origin (GIs) are expressly carved out from the EU certification marks regime. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 12:00 pm
See, e.g., Zivotofsky v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm
The Arizona Supreme Court was asked an increasingly familiar question: Does the US Supreme Court’s ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
