Search for: "S G
v.
J G"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 3,821
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2015, 10:56 am
It has been all quiet on the pharma patent front since the beginning of March (when the epic series of first instance decisions on Swiss form claims came to and end: see here, here, here and here), and so this moggy was delighted when there fell into his paws the decision of Mr Justice Arnold in Novartis v Focus, Actavis, Teva [2015] EWHC 1068 (Pat).The case concerns a transdermal patch for rivastigmine, which is acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitor used in the treatment of… [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 4:00 am
Adell, Razing the Forest to Kill a Tree: EEOC V. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
” Id at n.198., quoting from Kenneth J. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 8:00 am
Dayton, University of Connecticut, and Sharon V. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 8:06 am
A mutant ketol-acid reductoisomerase enzyme according to claim 6 wherein: a) the residue at position 47 has an amino acid substation selected from the group consisting of A, C, D, F, G, I, L, N, P, H, T, E and Y; b) the residue at position 50 has an amino acid substitution selected from the group consisting of A, C, D, E, F, G, M, N, V, W and I; c) the residue at position 52 has an amino acid substitution selected from the group consisting of A, C, D, G, H, N, Y,… [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 2:46 pm
Andews v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 4:36 am
VANDE LANOTTE, G. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 4:03 pm
Andews v. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 1:55 pm
., Plaintiff, v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 2:50 pm
This is one such lamentable example, with the effect that the children were pushed from ‘pillar to post’ (see [33](xvi) above, and R(G) v Southwark at [28(3)]). [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 1:54 pm
2011 NY Slip Op 52244 Leslie G., Petitioner, v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 1:53 pm
Jenkins, Plaintiff(s), v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 3:33 am
A partir de lo expuesto por Bauman y Lyon, propongo una reflexión sobre los medios sociales en las vidas cotidianas de los jóvenes universitarios. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 11:15 am
., Plaintiff, v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 8:33 am
A classic citation along these lines is Pierotti v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 6:30 am
"*The court said that because there was no indication that criminal charges are actually being contemplated, Supreme Court properly "reject[ed] [the County’s] claim that because the [g]rand [j]ury proceeding[s] could have resulted in criminal charges against [Mossman ], the proceeding[s] [were] not civil in nature" and that any other holding “would defeat the clear intent of the statute, which insulates public employees from… [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 11:18 am
However, the court failed to set forth the statutory factors considered in determining the respective equitable distribution rights of the parties and the reasons for its decision (see, Domestic Relations Law § 236[B][5][g]; Annis v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 3:30 am
Sergio J. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 2:12 pm
Stephen S., supra at 947; Matter of Canazon v. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 11:14 am
2011 NY Slip Op 52244 Leslie G., Petitioner, v. [read post]
