Search for: "Light v. State Bar"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 5,599
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2018, 2:17 pm
The case invites the Supreme Court to revisit precedent that generally bars states from collecting sales and use taxes on internet and direct-mail sales from out-of-state buyers. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 11:01 pm
Broadcom Corp, the Federal Circuit held that applications of the one-year time bar for inter partes review are, indeed, subject to judicial review in light of the Supreme Court’s 2016 decision in Cuozzo Speed Techs. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 4:43 pm
In the recent case of United States District Court v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 7:11 pm
The appropriate scope of this bar has now been reconsidered by the Federal Circuit in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Cuozzo Speed Technologies , LLC v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 2:33 pm
The law also includes a non-exhaustive list of possible accommodations, including providing pregnant workers (i) more frequent or longer paid or unpaid breaks; (ii) time off to recover from childbirth with or without pay; (iii) acquisition or modification of equipment or seating; (iv) temporary transfer to a less strenuous or hazardous position; (v) job restructuring; (vi) light duty; (vii) private non-bathroom space for expressing breast milk; (viii) assistance with manual labor;… [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 2:33 pm
The law also includes a non-exhaustive list of possible accommodations, including providing pregnant workers (i) more frequent or longer paid or unpaid breaks; (ii) time off to recover from childbirth with or without pay; (iii) acquisition or modification of equipment or seating; (iv) temporary transfer to a less strenuous or hazardous position; (v) job restructuring; (vi) light duty; (vii) private non-bathroom space for expressing breast milk; (viii) assistance with manual labor;… [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 8:53 am
The trial court denied the petition,3 and in a non-precedential opinion [sic], the Ninth Circuit affirmed the denial of coram nobis.4 United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:56 am
Tao Licensing, LLC v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 8:48 am
Côté J’s majority opinion endorsed the latter approach.[17] This is a very significant decision for the criminal defence bar, who will no longer have to risk calling their client in a Charter voir dire to establish standing. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 5:08 pm
As of December 29, 2017, the Senate has confirmed including 19 Trump administration judicial nominees, including one Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, 12 judges for the United States Courts of Appeals, and six judges for the United States District Courts. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 8:00 am
Ballweg v. [read post]
1 Jan 2018, 6:50 am
In Texas v. [read post]
1 Jan 2018, 4:30 am
That includes the American Bar Association; regulators in state bars; law school deans; managing partners of law firms; leaders of the bench; corporate chief legal officers and general counsel; insurance carriers; executive directors, presidents, and board chairs of leading nonprofits and NGOs. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 5:00 am
Section 8371.The Supreme Court adopted the two-part test enunciated in the case of Terletsky v. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court in Kokesh v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 am
The court supported this argument with a citation to United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 am
Roosevelt to bar entry of persons “prejudicial to the interests of the United States” delegated only narrow power to exclude saboteurs and hostile foreign agents. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
