Search for: "State v. David" Results 1941 - 1960 of 14,227
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am by Marty Lederman
Participating States must also comply with various other requirements, including those that protect against waste, fraud, and abuse; those that protect the health and safety, and the privacy, of Medicaid beneficiaries; those that ensure that the States adequately accomplish the goals of the program (see the recent decision in Douglas v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 11:35 am
The opinion goes on to explain that David Novick and Lisa Maunu began dating in December 2013. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 4:22 pm by NL
As will become clear, I lean towards the second option… RH v North Tyneside Council v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (HB) [2010] UKUT 462 (AAC) This was a housing benefit appeal, indeed the second HB appeal related to this matter. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 4:22 pm by NL
As will become clear, I lean towards the second option… RH v North Tyneside Council v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (HB) [2010] UKUT 462 (AAC) This was a housing benefit appeal, indeed the second HB appeal related to this matter. [read post]
5 Aug 2005, 6:34 am
This week's New Jersey Legal Update podcast will feature the New Jersey Supreme Court's decision in Gerety v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 8:06 pm
Problem 14 --David Schultz, The State of Democracy in North Dakota --Notes and Questions -- Shaun Bowler When Is It OK to Limit Direct Democracy C. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 5:02 am by INFORRM
  The judge stated that “it is quite plain in my view that it is a “lifestyle” interview” and accepted that he had “no authority in that capacity to make statements”. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 6:31 am
Italy): On Right Outcomes and Wrong Terms Marco Calisto, Jurisdictional Immunities of the State: Germany v. [read post]
In The State of Qatar v Banque Havilland  [2021] EWHC 2172 (Comm), David Edwards QC ordered the report and associated working papers within the defendant’s control to be disclosed on the basis that: The Bank had not shown that it faced “adversarial” litigation when the report was commissioned. [read post]