Search for: "BARBER v. BARBER" Results 161 - 180 of 499
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2016, 9:13 am by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In a 60 page opinion in Barber v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
However, his application for disability benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law §207-c was denied, which administrative determination was affirmed by the Appellate Division [see Matter of Jackson v Barber, 133 AD3d 958].In August 2013, Jacksonsubmitted a physician's note stating that, as a result of his foot condition, he was restricted from working more than 40 hours and 35 minutes per week. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 2:59 am by Robin Shea
*Amy Beth Dambeck of our Princeton Office has an excellent analysis of the New Jersey Supreme Court’s decision in Rodriguez v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 6:39 am by Daily Record Staff
Through Barber Transportation’s contract with the Baltimore City Public Schools (“BCPS”), Mr. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 3:24 pm by admin
**Nestle Defends Class Action in the Central District of California with Successful Motion to Dismiss and Sets Valuable Precedent With California Transparency in Supply Chains Act Safe Harbor Defense** . . . [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Workers' Compensation Board’s granting an award for a work-related injury does not, "by operation of collateral estoppel,” automatically entitle the claimant to General Municipal Law §207-c benefitsJackson v Barber, 2015 NY Slip Op 08025, Appellate Division, Third Department Lawrence Jackson, diagnosed with plantar fasciitis* in his left foot while working as a correction officer for the Cortland County Sheriff's Department, filed an application for… [read post]