Search for: "Barber v. Taylor*"
Results 1 - 20
of 26
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2010, 7:00 am
In Barber v Croydon LBC [2010] EWCA Civ 51, the Court of Appeal found Croydon’s decision to pursue possession proceedings of a non-secure tenancy occupied by Mr Barber Wednesbury unreasonable, being by my estimation the third such successful use of a gateway (b) defence in the higher courts (after Doherty itself and McGlynn). [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 3:37 am
While there are still 24 cases to be decided by the US Supreme Court before its term ends in two weeks, only three came down this past week, all involving Federal issues: Barber v. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
In Ford v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 6:11 pm
Barber and attorneys Joyner and McSurely, and shared the above passages with them for comment. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
The homelessness cases were never going to succeed because there was CA authority in the way (Barber and McGlynn v Welwyn Hatfield DC [2009] EWCA Civ 285). [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
The homelessness cases were never going to succeed because there was CA authority in the way (Barber and McGlynn v Welwyn Hatfield DC [2009] EWCA Civ 285). [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:22 pm
Following Central Bedfordshire Council v Taylor [2010] 1 WLR 446 and Barber v Croydon LBC[2010] EWCA Civ 51 (and contra Doran v Liverpool CC [2009] 1 WLR 2365), at issue is a series of decisions, from deciding to serve notice through to enforcement of a warrant. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:22 pm
Following Central Bedfordshire Council v Taylor [2010] 1 WLR 446 and Barber v Croydon LBC[2010] EWCA Civ 51 (and contra Doran v Liverpool CC [2009] 1 WLR 2365), at issue is a series of decisions, from deciding to serve notice through to enforcement of a warrant. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 7:34 am
In particular, the problem of Fry J's well-known five probanda in Willmott v Barber (1880) 15 Ch D 96, at 105, which has bedevilled this area in the past, is again at stake here because eg it was not known whether the Defendants' predecessor in title had made a mistake as to his legal rights (probanda 1). [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 7:34 am
In particular, the problem of Fry J's well-known five probanda in Willmott v Barber (1880) 15 Ch D 96, at 105, which has bedevilled this area in the past, is again at stake here because eg it was not known whether the Defendants' predecessor in title had made a mistake as to his legal rights (probanda 1). [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
However, his application for disability benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law §207-c was denied, which administrative determination was affirmed by the Appellate Division [see Matter of Jackson v Barber, 133 AD3d 958].In August 2013, Jacksonsubmitted a physician's note stating that, as a result of his foot condition, he was restricted from working more than 40 hours and 35 minutes per week. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 9:31 pm
" Taylor v Farrugia [2009] NSWSC 801 (5 June 2009) Related posts:Ontario: Jurisdiction and Family Law In Okmyansky v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 2:31 am
MUNROE v. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 6:27 am
The Press Gazette reports the judgment under the headline Lynn Barber libel victory ‘raises bar’ for claimants. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:11 am
” At the Sentencing Law Blog, Douglas Berman discusses the “fascinating sentencing dog[] that did not end up barking” in Monday’s Barber v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:49 am
United States and Barber v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 2:51 am
This gap of 446 days between libel jury trials seems to be the longest in English legal history (the trial in Bryce v Barber listed for 26 July 2010 having, in the event, been tried by a judge alone). [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 3:50 pm
Barber, [2002] O.J. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
Goes back 4 years to Obama v. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 2:15 pm
Jewell had testified that he believed that STATA generated this confidence interval by “flip[ping]” the Taylor series approximation. [read post]
