Search for: "Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth" Results 21 - 40 of 61
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2021, 6:10 am by Resnick Law Group, P.C.
It based this rule on the Ellerth/Faragher analysis, named after two Supreme Court rulings from 1998, Burlington Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 11:27 am by Sheppard Mullin
Instead, it was adopted by the Supreme Court as a way to identify those individuals whose actions could give rise to vicarious employer liability in the two earlier decisions of Burlington Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 7:17 am by Resnick Law Group, P.C.
“[T]he employer exercised reasonable care to prevent and correct promptly any sexually harassing behavior,” Burlington Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 6:20 pm by Robin E. Shea
The vicarious liability standard for supervisor harassment was announced in two Supreme Court decisions from 1998: Burlington Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:47 am by Kali Borkoski
City of Boca Raton and Burlington Industries, Inc. v. [read post]