Search for: "Connecticut Employment Law Letter" Results 281 - 300 of 449
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2013, 5:16 am by Daniel Schwartz
  In my series of the “basics” of various employment laws (see prior installments here,here and here), this week the topic is offer letters. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 5:15 am by Daniel Schwartz
As I’ve noted before, both the U.S. and the Connecticut Department of Labor have had a renewed focus on investigating employers for compliance with state and federal wage & hour laws. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 12:12 am by JP Sarmiento
We included the job offer letter, employment verification letters from our client’s previous employers, and other necessary supporting documents. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 1:18 pm by Albert Wan
 ”And did you see all those law books he had? [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 1:36 pm by Ken
Also threatened a blogger for satirizing him and wrote to that blogger's employer. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 9:15 pm by David Smyth
”  Andrien says Obus then clarified that the “little birdie” was from Connecticut, and even more specifically, at GE. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 4:30 pm by Pamela Wolf
Federal and state law compliance-related issues may be confusing and challenging for employers. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 4:22 pm by Daniel Schwartz
Employers should be conscious about following guidance from officials and following the letter of the law. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 10:23 am by Lindsay Griffiths
Kevin said that he's never done that in his nine years of blogging, but knows that Dan Schwartz of the Connecticut Employment Law Blog has done that. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 11:09 am by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
District Court for the District of Connecticut (“Court”) has adopted a broad view of who qualifies as a “whistleblower” under that law. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 7:09 am by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
District Court for the District of Connecticut (“Court”) has adopted a broad view of who qualifies as a “whistleblower” under that law. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 1:47 am by Kevin LaCroix
”   As noted in a September 21, 2012 memorandum from the Franczek Radelet law firm about the ruling (here), the need to review social media policies applies to both union and non-union employers, adding that “now more than ever, all employers should continue to review and update all of their policies to ensure that they are specific, narrowly tailored to their business needs, and do not sweep so broadly so as to interfere with employee rights under federal… [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 10:42 am by Connecticut Employment Law Letter
Sterling is an employment law attorney with JordenBurt LLP in Simsbury and an editor of Connecticut Employment Law Letter. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 4:55 am by Jon Hyman
— from Phil Miles’s Lawffice Space Wage & Hour The One In Which I Try to Explain the Joint Employer Test — from Dan Schwartz’s Connecticut Employment Law Blog FLSA Lessons from Gordon Ramsay — from Molly DiBianca’s Delaware Employment Law Blog Can my boss track my hours? [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 4:27 pm by John Holmquist
 To further educate today's workforce, it has set up a page on its website dedicated to concerted, protected activities.Dan Schwartz at the Connecticut Employment law blog had a post with remarks from Acting General Counsel Solomon concerning a focus on the at will disclaimer contained in virtually all handbooks. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:45 am by Susan Brenner
Janvier testified that after being interviewed by law enforcement, she obtained access to her husband's email account in 2009, and observed he had scam letters in the account.U.S. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 11:30 am by William McGrath
("CCI"), the employer of defendants, who cooperated with the investigation and provided certain information. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:53 pm by Matthew Bush
Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust FundsDocket: 11-1085Issue(s): (1) Whether, in a misrepresentation case under Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5, the district court must require proof of materiality before certifying a plaintiff class based on the fraud-on-the-market theory; and (2) whether, in such a case, the district court must allow the defendant to present evidence rebutting the applicability of the fraud-on-the-market theory before certifying a plaintiff class based… [read post]