Search for: "Doe v. Barnett" Results 81 - 100 of 806
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Parrish (upholding minimum wage legislation) and Barnett v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
It is on a similar principle that Professor Barnett once expressed that he "is sympathetic" with Professor Jack Balkin's claim that Roe v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:56 pm by David Kopel
Randy Barnett and the Commerce Clause Koppelman takes aim a [read post]
2 May 2022, 1:48 pm by Jonathan M. Barnett
Barnett of USC Gould School of Law—the eighth entry in our FTC UMC Rulemaking symposium—are developed in greater detail in “Regulatory Rents: An Agency-Cost Analysis of the FTC Rulemaking Initiative,” a chapter in the forthcoming book FTC’s Rulemaking Authority, which will be published by Concurrences later this year. [read post]
2 May 2022, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
" He has made it clear that, in addition to rejecting Roe and Casey, and the delegation doctrine, a particular object of his scorn is Obergefell v. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 4:34 am by Charles Sartain
He argued that, under the Supreme Court’s opinion in Occidental Chemical Corp. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 10:36 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
  The House of Bruar admitted infringement of the Amira boot, such that it was only the Regina boot that was at issue in the recent judgment of Miss Recorder Amanda Michaels in Fairfax & Favor v House of Bruar [2022] EWHC 689. [read post]
29 Jan 2022, 3:10 pm by Eugene Volokh
Ilya Shapiro, formerly of the Cato Institute and now executive director of the Georgetown Center for the Constitution (which is headed by my co-blogger Randy Barnett), tweeted this earlier this week: Objectively best pick for Biden is Sri Srinivasan, who is solid prog & v smart. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 5:00 am by Eric Segall
But the book is fascinating, accessible when necessary and sophisticated where appropriate, and most importantly, it does what books by law professors ought to do: it makes one think, reflect, and then re-examine core assumptions. [read post]