Search for: "Harris v. Ford Motor Co." Results 1 - 20 of 56
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2015, 10:14 am by Jason L. Odom
Ford Motor Co., the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals addressed whether an employee suffering from irritable bowel syndrome could be allowed to work by telecommuting as an accommodation for her condition. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 7:49 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Ford Motor Co., 667 F.3d 1261, 1268–69 (Fed. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 8:21 am by Jason Shinn
What this means for Employers Employers and HR professionals should read the entire EEOC v Ford Motor Co. opinion. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 9:06 pm by Jason Shinn
What this means for Employers Employers and HR professionals should read the entire EEOC v Ford Motor Co. opinion. [read post]
21 May 2014, 10:44 am by Richard S. Zackin
Ford Motor Co., a case in which the agency brought suit on behalf of a Ford employee who alleged she was terminated in retaliation for filing a charge of discrimination with the EEOC. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 7:47 am by Tom Crane
Ford Motor Co., 2014 WL 1584674 (6th Cir. 4/22/14), the district court found that the worker was not a qualified individual with a disability, because of her excessive absenteeism. [read post]
13 May 2015, 10:49 am by Richard S. Zackin
Ford Motor Co., in which the panel held that the EEOC was entitled to a jury trial on its claim that Ford discharged an employee in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) after it denied her request to work from home 4 days per week as an accommodation for her irritable bowel syndrome (“IBS”). [read post]
6 May 2014, 7:00 am by Melissa Healy
Ford Motor Co. that regular attendance may not mean physical presence in the workplace, and that telecommuting may be a reasonable accommodation for some employees with disabilities under the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"). [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 6:46 am by Jason Shinn
This time, the Court determined that Ford Motor Co. did not violate the ADA by refusing to allow an employee with irritable bowel syndrome to telecommute up to four days a week because “regular and predictable attendance” at the workplace was an essential function of her job. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 5:50 am by David G. Badertscher
VerdiKINGS COUNTYMotor Vehicles Defendant Entitled to Partial Refund of Lease Payments for Deprivation of Use of Vehicle Ford Motor Credit Co. [read post]