Search for: "JOHN DOE v. PRINCETON UNIVERSITY" Results 1 - 20 of 94
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2024, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Harvard and the Memory Wars”October 10th, 2024: Beth Lew-Williams (Princeton University), “John Doe China Man: Race and Law in the American West”October 17th, 2024: Sarah Seo (Columbia Law School), "The Necessity of the Circumstantial Case"November 14th, 2024: Gautham Rao (American University), excerpts from White Power: Policing American Slavery (manuscript under contract) (introduction and chapter 5, "The Other… [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 10:33 am by The Public Employment Law Press
State voters may amend a state's constitution to prohibit consideration of racial preferences with respect admission to colleges and universities if it does not reflect a racially discriminatory purpose Schuette v. [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 4:17 am
Murphy, emeritus of Princeton University. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 3:28 am by SHG
This campus admissions season was the first under the new rule of SSFA v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 3:20 pm by Dave Maass
Other experts signed on to the brief come from Johns Hopkins University, the University of Michigan, Rice University and Purdue. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 4:59 pm by David Kopel
Among the questioners was Princeton University’s Robert George. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 7:18 am
The Passions: A Study of Human Nature (John Wiley & Sons, 2018)Harris, William V. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 1:27 pm
How does that Constitution go? [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 1:04 pm by Alfred Brophy
Our next contribution in the Watchman symposium is from Ariela Gross, who is the John B. and Alice R. [read post]
6 May 2015, 7:09 pm by Jon Gelman
” I am an Emeritus Professor at Rutgers University and at Cornell University. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 9:01 am by Tejinder Singh
Colloton graduated from Princeton University and Yale Law School before clerking for Judge Laurence Silberman on the U. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Much of the research he presents "has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]