Search for: "L & F PRODUCTS v. Procter & Gamble Co."
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Joiner had can cause small-cell lung cancer.[13] Perhaps the most egregious lapses in scholarship occur when Ranges, a newly minted scientist, and her co-author, a full professor of law, write: “For example, Bendectin, an antinausea medication prescribed to pregnant women, caused a slew of birth defects (hence its nickname ‘The Second Thalidomide’).49”[14] I had to re-read this sentence many times to make sure I was not hallucinating. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 1:29 pm
One of the most remarkable, and objectionable, aspects of the third edition was its failure to engage with Federal Rule of Evidence of 703, and the need for courts to assess the validity of individual studies relied upon. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
For example, in the context of the attorney work-product privilege, at issue in FTC v. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 2:17 pm
Procter & Gamble Co., 580 F. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 5:40 am
See Procter & Gamble Co. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am
Third, the product liability defendant can seek remedies in the specific cases, after prevailing, for bad faith filings or improper conduct by lawyers. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
L. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 12:17 pm
L. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
Whitman also serves as a director of The Procter & Gamble Company and is a former director of DreamWorks Animation SKG, Inc. and Zipcar, Inc. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 8:30 pm
Procter & Gamble Co., 414 F.3d 1342, 1345–47(Fed. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 7:14 am
Procter & Gamble Co., 580 F. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 7:14 am
Procter & Gamble Co., 580 F. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 1:55 pm
Procter & Gamble Co., 580 F. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:56 pm
Reynolds Tobacco Co., 537 F.3d 1357, 1365 (Fed. [read post]
10 May 2011, 1:29 pm
§318 and the precedential guidance of Procter & Gamble Co. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 5:52 pm
KSR Int'l Co. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:08 pm
Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 10:51 am
Procter & Gamble Co. v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
Once implemented, this legislation will ensure that the dominant industrial global food system is anointed as the only legitimate manner of food production and distribution, a deception that amounts to a covert continuation of the Enclosure Movement.[1] Just as the Enclosure acts during the 17th through 19th centuries drove peasants off what was once communal land, the food safety legislation will serve to bar small- and medium-sized business people from engaging in food… [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 8:57 pm
"); Procter & Gamble Co. v. [read post]
