Search for: "Levin v. Spellings"
Results 1 - 20
of 50
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
Selecoff (as his name was then often spelled) arrived in Vancouver from Sydney, on the S.S. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 6:18 am
In 1969, in Bergman v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 5:01 am
The protesters maintain that the package would spell the end of liberal democracy in Israel. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 6:01 am
Going into the House select committee’s hearings to investigate the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, press coverage was cautious—even dour—about what the effort would be able to accomplish. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
Like most secular Jews, I’m particularly interested in a particular Talmudic passage that Levine cites, Bava Metzia 59b, from the Babylonian Talmud. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 7:37 am
Ronald Levin is the William R. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 2:54 pm
Levine, 70 F.R.D 674, 677 (S.D.N.Y. 1976) citing Lau v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 9:05 pm
Two of Georgia’s most accomplished appellate attorneys, Savannah’s Amy Lee Copeland and Atlanta’s Amy Levin Weil, are representing Parnell in the motion hearing. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
True, the case that spelled the end of the discriminatory Defense of Marriage Act (U.S. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 2:40 pm
In March 2020, in Salzberg v. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 9:38 am
The Second Circuit stated in Faiveley Transport Malmo AB v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 8:36 am
Ronald Levin is the William R. [read post]
8 May 2019, 7:14 am
Genus Lifesciences Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am
Selecoff (as his name was then often spelled) arrived in Vancouver from Sydney, on the S.S. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 1:12 pm
Saltzman, Tanis, Pittel, Levin & Jacobson, Inc. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 1:12 pm
Saltzman, Tanis, Pittel, Levin & Jacobson, Inc. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 6:27 am
Levin filing. [read post]
9 May 2017, 11:11 am
The case, U.S. v. [read post]
