Search for: "Peoples Drug Stores v. District of Columbia"
Results 21 - 40
of 56
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
Cigarette tax rates increased in 37 states and the District of Columbia between 2006 and 2017. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 10:36 am
As of April 22, 2019, a total of 358 people infected with the outbreak strain of Salmonella Reading were reported from 42 states and the District of Columbia. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 9:00 am
Subsequent to the FDA approval of Epidiolox, The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) issued a Final Order placing “FDA-approved drugs that contain CBD derived from cannabis and no more than 0.1 percent tetrahydrocannabinols” [such as Epidiolox] in Schedule V of the Controlled Substances Act,” “Schedule V drugs are considered to have the lowest potential for abuse compared to other scheduled drugs and a low… [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 11:00 am
District Court for the District of Columbia barring the bulk collection, the government immediately appealed to the court of appeals for a stay, which was granted. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 11:26 am
In Lorenzo v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 3:50 am
Ransomware attacks target the most vulnerable part of a company’s computer networks: people. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 1:43 pm
VA Handbook 6500.6 provides the following: Applicability—This guidance applies to contractor systems that store, generate, transmit or exchange VA sensitive information in a contractor-developed and -maint [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am
Many people talk a good game on law and politics. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 5:17 am
Consider for example in Casias v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
App. 2006) (approving jury instruction based on Restatement §908).District of Columbia: Destefano v. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 9:48 am
” District of Columbia v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
First, the government might argue that some people find handgun advertising offensive, and do not wish to see it in public places. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 6:24 am
People v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 3:39 pm
Yesterday the Tenth Circuit heard oral arguments in Bonidy v. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
In Carroll v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:16 am
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. and Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 11:00 am
There are any number of cases (like this one from 2006 in the District of Columbia) that suggest that the only “content” in an email communication, for example, is the subject line and the body of the message. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 2:19 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled in Casias v. [read post]
20 May 2012, 1:11 pm
The Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (i.e. [read post]
