Search for: "Powers v. State Highway Board" Results 1 - 20 of 196
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2017, 5:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
" Local Law 1-2012 consolidated Town vehicle maintenance operations to one central garage by transferring the authority to appoint and supervise automotive mechanics responsible for the repair, service, and maintenance of Highway Department vehicles from the Town of Clarkstown Highway Superintendent to the Town Board of the Town of Clarkstown.Supreme Court ruled in favor of Plaintiffs, concluding that Local Law 1-2012 was preempted by the State's… [read post]
State Power First and foremost, states currently retain power to decide who stays home and for how long. [read post]
15 May 2022, 9:11 pm by The Regulatory Review Staff
November 2, 2021 | A Fili-Busted Balance of Power | The filibuster has caused Congress to give up its constitutional power to oversee the administrative state June 9, 2021 | Making Drugs Safe to Kill? [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 8:46 pm by Howard Friedman
Davenport, 637 F.3d 1095 (2010) he wrote a dissent from the denial of an en banc rehearing in a case which held that memorial crosses donated by the Utah Highway Patrol Association and placed on public property to commemorate fallen troopers violate the Establishment Clause.⇾ In United States v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:06 am by rhapsodyinbooks
” A state historical highway marker was dedicated to Buck v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 6:43 am by Marissa Miller
With the Court set to hear arguments this week in two of the Term’s most anticipated cases – United States v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 5:40 pm by Patricia Salkin
Board of Supervisors of West Hanover Township (Pa.Cmwlth. 2012 WL 8666779) held to be a valid exercise of zoning powers. [read post]
29 Nov 2008, 2:40 pm
  This is a thorny and interesting issue of the power of the State Treasurer versus that of the Attorney General. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
"Finding that substantial evidence supported the Comptroller's determination that Dreher was not in service when he was injured, and notwithstanding the fact that he received line of duty injury benefits under the terms of the collective bargaining agreement, the court dismissed Dreher’s appeal.Determining whether an individual was “in service” for the purposes of establishing eligibility for Workers’ Compensation benefits was an issue in Neacosia v NY… [read post]