Search for: "Public Employment Relations Board"
Results 61 - 80
of 7,000
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2012, 8:09 am
SB 857: This law abolishes the Public Employee Relations Board’s authority to award damages for an unlawful strike. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 1:58 pm
The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has made good on its promise to revisit the standard for determining joint-employer status under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) through the rulemaking process. [read post]
5 May 2010, 2:55 pm
On May 5, the Conference Board of Canada released a report entitled The Economic and Employment Impacts of Climate-Related Technology Investments. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 3:30 am
Scabby feared no man either, except for Peter Robb, the former General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 4:47 am
The public may submit comments to the Board on the proposed rule for sixty days following its publication on September 14. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 10:00 am
Ring announced that the Board will address, once again, the standard for determining joint employer status under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 6:07 am
On December 28, 2018, a divided Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld portions of an Obama-era standard for determining “joint employer” status under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), ultimately sending the case back to the National Labor Relations Board for clarification and reassessment. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 10:45 am
On February 25, 2020, the National Labor Relations Board released its long-awaited final rule regarding joint-employer status under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 3:05 pm
By Steve Gutierrez In a series of decisions that affect both union and non-union employers, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or Board) has overruled numerous controversial standards that had broadened the coverage of employee rights in recent years. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 6:00 am
The National Labor Relations Board (the “Board”) recently issued a decision in UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside that reverses longstanding Board precedent and holds that employers no longer have to allow nonemployee union representatives access to public areas of their property unless (1) the union has no other means of communicating with employees or (2) the employer discriminates against the union by allowing access to similar… [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 2:11 pm
The Ontario Court of Appeal overturned two Divisional Court decisions, finding the lower court failed to apply the required Vavilov standard of review to the Ontario Labour Relations Board’s determination that various companies were “related employers” under the Labour Relations Act, 1995. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 12:03 pm
Two recent developments involving the National Labor Relations Board’s scrutiny of restrictive covenant agreements, per its general counsel’s Memorandum 23-08, have provided a mix of good and bad news for employers. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:31 am
National Labor Relations Board (No. 11-1470)). [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 10:20 am
On June 23, 2020, the National Labor Relations Board issued its decision in 800 River Road Operating Company, LLC d/b/a Care One at New Milford, 369 NLRB No. 109 (2020), holding that employers have no duty to bargain over serious employee discipline imposed before the negotiation of a collective bargaining agreement. [read post]
30 May 2019, 7:27 am
Moreover, this change strengthen the marshalling provisions of the Labour Relations Code to also apply to Human Rights applications in respect to matters before the Labour Relations Board, arbitration boards, the Human Rights Commission, Employment Standards, the Privacy Commissioner, the Workers’ Compensation Board, a Board of Reference under th [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:54 am
R.C. 121.22(G)(1)(creates a personnel deliberations exception to the open meetings requirement and authorizes a public body to meet in executive session to consider matters relating to the employment of a public employee, unless the public employee requests a public hearing, in which case, an open session must be held.) [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 9:46 pm
AFSCME Local 189, 22 PECBR 752, 2008 WL 5053548 (Oregon Employment Relations Board Oct. 23, 2008),Download employment_relations_boardstate_of_oregon_afscme_local_189.wpd illustrates an important principal of labor law which applies in both the private and public sectors. [read post]
8 May 2014, 4:00 am
A public employer may impose restraints on First Amendment activities of its employees that are job-related that would be unconstitutional if applied to the public at largeSanter v Board of Educ. of E. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
New York State Public Employment Relations Board, Albany (Ellen M. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
New York State Public Employment Relations Board, Albany (Ellen M. [read post]
