Search for: "Smith v. City of Pittsburgh" Results 1 - 20 of 46
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2020, 4:35 am by Howard Friedman
Moreland, Comments on Steven Smith, 'Pagans and Christians in the City', (57 Journal of Catholic Legal Studies 63 (2019)).Craig Konnoth, Keynote: The Protection of LGBT Youth, (University of Pittsburgh Law Review, Vol. 81, 2019)).Michael Conklin, Good for Thee, but Not for Me: How Bisexuals are Overlooked in Title VII Sexual Orientation Arguments, U. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:34 am by Eugene Volokh
Sineneng-Smith, a case having to do with when speech encouraging illegal conduct (there, illegal entry into the U.S. or illegal residence in the U.S.) can be criminally punished. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:44 am by Dan Bressler
” “Alesia Truxell, as the representative of the estate of Lawrence Chertik Jr., along with Jacob Speller and Jennifer Vining, had sued Pittsburgh, Spin and Segway in September, claiming that the scooters were unsafe for the bumps and potholes of Pittsburgh’s roadways, especially at night when other cities restricted the scooters’ usage. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 12:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
This post has been submitted by John Iole, a partner in the Pittsburgh office of the Jones Day law firm. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm by Schachtman
Schering Health Care Ltd., [2002] EWHC 1420, at ¶ 21 (QB), (2002) 70 BMLR 88 Smith v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Smith & Nephew, 2005 WL 3470337, at *5 (M.D. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:25 am
Against Church of the Good Shepherd, Town and Country, Missouri (MO) (plaintiffs were Bishop Wayne Smith of the Diocese of Missouri and ECUSA [joined as a necessary party, due to its claimed interest under the Dennis Canon]; trial cou [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 9:00 am by P. Andrew Torrez
Finally:  Mondaq has a very nice summary of the Fifth Circuit's recent opinion in Avalon Legal Information Svcs. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am by Schachtman
Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 127 N.J. 428, 605 A.2d 1092 (1992) In re Joint E. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm by RHP
In another lawsuit, the city of Pittsburgh (CA.) settled a case for $145,000 because of the plaintiff’s claim that excessive force was used by a police K-9 in his apprehension. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm by RHP
In another lawsuit, the city of Pittsburgh (CA.) settled a case for $145,000 because of the plaintiff’s claim that excessive force was used by a police K-9 in his apprehension. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm by RHP
In another lawsuit, the city of Pittsburgh (CA.) settled a case for $145,000 because of the plaintiff’s claim that excessive force was used by a police K-9 in his apprehension. [read post]