Search for: "United States v. Ware"
Results 121 - 140
of 219
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2006, 10:08 am
The United States Shoe Corporation was an appeal from a decision of the Opposition Board which refused registration of THE INVINCIBLES for use in association with "eyeglass lenses" and related wares on the basis that it was confusing with the opponent's mark, INVISIBLES for "ophthalmic (sic) lenses". [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 9:01 pm
The case is captioned and docketed as United States of America v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
(Elizabeth Parsons Ware) Max D. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 8:55 am
Flo & Eddie, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 3:22 am
" Recot Inc. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 12:30 pm
See State v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 2:38 pm
(Ware v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:45 am
In his article, Professor Ware discusses user fees and the role arbitration may play in easing the overcrowding often found in courts across the United States. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 10:02 am
[T]he Government . . . expects to prove at trial that there are high-frequency trading systems that may be purchased by securities trading firms, and that Goldman maintains computers in the United States and elsewhere in the world that use its Trading System to conduct trading on world markets. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 1:01 am
Six convictions (known as the Ware defendants) were overturned at the state level for technical trial details. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 10:56 am
They lashed out against other units and the government. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 6:34 am
[1] United States v. [read post]
1 May 2007, 1:06 am
The unanimous ruling in KSR International Co. v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 7:19 am
United States 473 U.S. 207 (1985) for the “proposition that the theft and subsequent interstate transmission of purely intangible property is beyond the scope of the NSPA. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:24 am
In addition to the actual use of the product described, infringement of an apparatus claim occurs when the invention is, among other things, made or sold in the United States. 35 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 11:40 am
United States Postal Service (unreported, 2005 FC 1630) decision which addressed the “public authority” issue. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 7:33 am
The Supreme Court held in Employment Division v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 2:24 am
Versata Soft- ware, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 12:42 pm
’” United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 2:03 pm
See United States v. [read post]
