Search for: "Webb v. State" Results 181 - 200 of 517
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2014, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
October 2012 (MC)), investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, sued for defamation (For example, see Applause Store Productions Ltd v Raphael [2008] EWHC 1781; Cairns v Modi [2012] EWHC 756 (QB); [2012] EWCA Civ 1382; Tilbrook v Parr [2012] EWHC 1946 (QB). [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 9:36 am by Jacek Stramski
The ruling reversed a decision by the Second District Court of Appeal in State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 9:12 pm
Contents include:Mini Symposium: Creating New Futures for All: International Law and the Protection of Migrant Children at Risk Yanghee Lee, Address: Creating New Futures for All Children: The Promise of International Human Rights Law Ron McCallum & Hannah Martin, Comment: The CRPD and Children with Disabilities Mary Crock, Of Relative Rights and Putative Children: Rethinking the Critical Framework for the Protection of Refugee Children and Youth Ben Saul, Indefinite Security… [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 8:27 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions   <> CTS Corp. v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 7:34 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The New York State Court of Appeals has breathed some life into the whistleblower law, under which most cases fail because the plaintiff must satisfy narrow requirements in order to prove that she was terminated from her position for speaking out against public health and safety violations at work.The case is Webb-Weber v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 6:32 am by Joy Waltemath
Reversing an appellate court’s dismissal of the employee’s claims on summary judgment, the New York Court of Appeals ruled that the employee was not required to identify — in her pleadings — the specific “law, rule or regulation” allegedly violated by the employer in order to state a plausible claim (Webb-Weber v Community Action for Human Services, Inc, May 13, 2014, Pigott, J). [read post]
15 May 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Co., 88 NY2d 869, and [2] that the violation must be of the kind that "creates a substantial and specific danger to the public health or safety," citing Remba v Federation Empl. [read post]