Posts tagged with: "▪-Inverse-condemnation"
Results 261 - 280
of 884
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2010, 5:37 pm
" It features a Virginia rancher whose property has been subject to condemnation 10 times, and who now is alleging an inverse condemnation claim because the VA DOT this time didn't bother to exercise eminent domain before it interfered with his property rights. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 9:47 am
Ruling on Submitted Matter Inverse Condemnation Motions Signed 06-22-17 by Mike Danko on Scribd https://www.scribd.com/embeds/352230835/content? [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 11:33 am
The plaintiff’s case was based on theories of inverse condemnation, trespass and nuisance. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 1:07 pm
Condemnees are entitled to litigation expenses in inverse condemnation cases. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 9:21 pm
That question is bound up in an understanding of the term "inverse condemnation," and is detailed in this post. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 12:24 pm
If successful, the inverse condemnation action also entitles the owner to recover attorneys’ fees, expert fees, and other litigation costs, so it’s important for agencies to ensure they consider potential liability with such projects. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 10:30 pm
Plaintiffs also sued the City of Kirkland claiming that Kirkland's approval of the zoning variances reduced their property value and therefore amounted to an inverse condemnation of their property. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 4:18 pm
The trial court also found a Penn Central taking and ordered the City to either comply with the writ or pay $1.3 million in just compensation for the inverse condemnation/regulatory taking. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 6:16 am
Superior Coatings filed an inverse condemnation action against the school district. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 12:17 pm
You still must pursue compensation in state court via a state law inverse condemnation claim and lose it, before you can even state a ripe claim under §1983. [3.] [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 12:17 pm
You still must pursue compensation in state court via a state law inverse condemnation claim and lose it, before you can even state a ripe claim under §1983. 3. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 6:31 am
” Roberts added that an inverse condemnation proceeding is “a very intensive procedure that seems more suited for state court than federal court. [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 8:18 am
The topics we follow are not limited strictly to "condemnation" or "eminent domain," and include regulatory takings and inverse condemnation, and pretty much anything that can be of interest to condemnation attorneys.We're looking for ways to communicate better with committee members and disseminate information about upcoming CLE teleconferences (some low cost, and some free of charge), new decisions and developments in… [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 9:40 am
As a result, view impairment, standing alone, cannot constitute an “intangible intrusion” that triggers inverse condemnation liability. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:05 pm
Beyond the traditional exercise of eminent domain, there are other types of “takings” including: Inverse Condemnation Regulatory Takings Learn more about inverse condemnation and regulatory takings. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:36 pm
In our niche practice of eminent domain, inverse condemnation, and regulatory takings, the blogosphere world is going bonkers. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 8:39 am
The plaintiff then brought the present action against the defendants for inverse condemnation and for monetary damages for an alleged violation of the plaintiff’s rights under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 11:15 am
Saying that a seizure isn't an inverse condemnation because it was not an exercise of eminent domain power gets you nowhere because inverse condemnation is, by definition, a taking that results from an exercise of some power other than the power of eminent domain. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 12:01 am
§ 1983, claims of inverse condemnation, trespass, nuisance,negligence and negligence per se, and strict liability, in violation of his rights under the First, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 7:49 pm
Edgewood brought action against city, alleging denial of equal protection under § 1983, denial of substantive due process under § 1983, denial of procedural due process under § 1983, inverse condemnation under § 1983, inverse condemnation under the Fifth Amendment, and inverse condemnation under State Constitution. [read post]
