Posts tagged with: "▪-Inverse-condemnation"
Results 221 - 240
of 884
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2013, 8:08 am
Finally, the Ninth Circuit dismissed the inverse condemnation claim, noting that the test under federal and state law is practically identical, and the California Supreme Court has expressly rejected an inverse claim on similar facts. [read post]
22 May 2019, 9:49 am
Because those easement rights were previously acquired and settled, there can be no inverse condemnation of property rights that no longer exist. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 1:58 pm
A case about when inverse condemnation cases are filed too soon, of course. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 7:33 am
One reason is the very murky law of inverse condemnation. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 7:39 am
Landowners brought an inverse condemnation action against city, challenging the city’s refusal to change the comprehensive plan. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 10:10 pm
So Jachetta sued in federal court for inverse condemnation and other related claims. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 3:01 am
City of San Antonio, No. 11-0104: "The city built a water project that affected the use of Kopplow’s property, and after being sued for inverse condemnation, the city decided to sue to condemn the land outright. [read post]
19 Nov 2016, 7:05 am
In January 2012, the Regans sued the Spectors and the town, “alleging trespass and nuisance against the Spectors and inverse condemnation against the Town. [read post]
23 May 2011, 3:05 am
Recent posts cover topics such as the "Wisconsin Blight Fight," inverse condemnation, federal utility condemnation, and more. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 6:08 am
Locke Lord has an experienced team of condemnation and inverse condemnation lawyers. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 5:23 am
Twp. of Ocean, 2015 WL 263913 (N.J. 1/22/2015) The opinion can be accessed at: http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/opinions/supreme/A-55-13Griepenburg.pdf Filed under: Condemnation/Eminent Domain, Current Caselaw Tagged: exhaustion of administrative remedies, inverse condemnation [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 9:36 pm
The Inverse Condemnation blog has some additional details about the case, including the complaint Baltimore has filed in state court. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 3:05 pm
West Hawaii Today has posted a story on an ongoing eminent domain case:Counsel for the developer William Meheula Jr. said inverse condemnation can only be proven if the defendants admit that the government is taking possession of the private property for a public purpose. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
Who owns an inverse condemnation claim? [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 10:43 am
App. 212 (2013), was an inverse condemnation case in which a property owner claimed that the DOT condemned a property interest he owned, when the DOT closed a driveway that led to his property. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 10:43 am
App. 212 (2013), was an inverse condemnation case in which a property owner claimed that the DOT condemned a property interest he owned, when the DOT closed a driveway that led to his property. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 9:14 am
Learning of these comments, the plaintiff filed an action for common law defamation and interference with prospective business advantage, as well as a claim for inverse condemnation. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 9:57 pm
SB 901 as passed by the Legislature does not make any changes to the state’s legal doctrine of inverse condemnation. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 9:57 pm
SB 901 as passed by the Legislature does not make any changes to the state’s legal doctrine of inverse condemnation. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 4:44 am
Inverse condemnation was properly pleaded. [read post]
