Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I"
Results 2461 - 2480
of 4,097
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2013, 9:17 am
State v. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 5:14 am
The prosecution then “offered Exhibit 20” into evidence, and Soto's counsel “stated: `Judge, for the record I have to object pursuant to a previous motion I made to the Court, but I do that only for the record. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 5:38 am
In the Court of Appeals in Munich -- Court of Appeals in Munich -- in a Senate [division of the court] dealing with trademarks, unfair competition, copyright, and antitrust law.Q. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm
Do I really need to know this stuff for all of my cases. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 3:25 am
LOVE: You are a judge in the patent division of the Dusseldorf Court of Appeals; is that correct? [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 5:25 am
Now, New York State's Appellate Division is hearing an appeal about whether Winter must comply with a subpoena to divulge confidential sources from her report. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 8:27 am
This past March, the Supreme Court considered in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
This was the insight of the Supreme Court’s decision in Apprendi v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 11:28 am
” In Matisoff v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 2:19 pm
I’ve avoided blogging about the June 12, 2013 Supreme Court opinion in Ware v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 11:56 am
While I can well understand that judges will not be required to pay the costs of appeal for correcting their decisions, I think she has a point. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 3:57 am
In an order dated March 27, 2013, the Bench comprising Justice Dharma Rao and Justice Aruna Jagadeesan stated that Sections 2(k), 85 and 87 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 fell foul of the law relating to tribunal appointments laid down by the Supreme Court in Union of India v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:01 pm
(Ontario Court of Appeal,TPG Technology Consulting Ltd. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 4:05 am
Citing People v Weaver (12 NY3d 433) and United States v Jones (132 S Ct 945, the Court of Appeals ruled that the State's action was a search within the meaning of the State and Federal Constitutions but that under the relevant facts in this case “did not require a warrant. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:43 am
Will the EPO Boards of Appeal or the UK Court of Appeal get the final decision in first? [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 12:55 pm
Because of this conflict, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the appeal in Vance v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 3:22 am
The trustees appealed to the Albany-based Appellate Division, Third Department, whose decision earlier this month upheld the lower court’s order based, in part, on the dictionary definition of “commitment. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 7:01 pm
The Appellate Division affirmed the decision of the trial court for “substantially [sic] the reasons stated by the trial judge…” and found no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s ruling. ____________________________________________________________ Eliana T. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 6:43 pm
Slip at 4, citing United States v. [read post]
