Search for: "In re C. B"
Results 281 - 300
of 11,593
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jan 2011, 11:45 am
Or else they keep paying and paying because they're afraid of the unknown, spelled b-a-n-k-r-u-p-t-c-y. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 1:48 pm
b. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 6:19 am
I am re-posting Attorney Bill Gallagher’s guest post on bail reform to include some additional information from him. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 3:23 am
In re Crane USA, Inc., Serial No. 86172232 (August 7, 2015) [not precedential].As we know, product configuration trade dress is registrable only upon proof of acquired distinctiveness. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 11:25 am
The latest issue of the Revue Québécoise de Droit International (Vol 29, no. 2, 2016) is out. [read post]
26 May 2006, 2:48 pm
Trustee Trends re the 707(b) "totality of circumstances" review. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 7:33 am
See In re Zletz, 893 F.2d 319, 321 (Fed. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 7:26 am
The headlines, though, are: (a) Ms Jones won the appeal so that her 90% share in the disputed property was re-instated; (b) the UKSC agree on the outcome but there is disagreement on the principles (esp Lord Wilson with Lord Kerr somewhere between); (c) the majority, in essence, follow Stack but, it might be said, with a slight change of emphasis or, more politely, with more explanation about inferring/imputing shares; (d) Lord Walker and Baroness Hale, who gave a joint… [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 7:26 am
The headlines, though, are: (a) Ms Jones won the appeal so that her 90% share in the disputed property was re-instated; (b) the UKSC agree on the outcome but there is disagreement on the principles (esp Lord Wilson with Lord Kerr somewhere between); (c) the majority, in essence, follow Stack but, it might be said, with a slight change of emphasis or, more politely, with more explanation about inferring/imputing shares; (d) Lord Walker and Baroness Hale, who gave a joint… [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 2:06 pm
In re Antonio B., 2008 Cal. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 2:22 pm
No, b/c transformative use doctrine has already produced a searchable database rule. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 11:32 am
(A) A three-hour lunch at Nobu (B) A day-long outing at your managing partner’s fancy country club (C) A Summer Associate Research Challenge (D) A ballgame at Fenway, in your firm’s field box If you answered (C), you should be working at Pillsbury Winthrop! [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 3:30 am
C’mon, man! [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 3:30 am
C’mon, man! [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 11:19 am
You're available at any time to speak at any length about any subject. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 11:19 am
You're available at any time to speak at any length about any subject. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 11:22 am
True that plaintiffs often look to compilation as fallback; but usually unprotectable not b/c missed one category but b/c it wasn’t original or was functional. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 9:00 pm
Selon les Directives C-IV 9.8 ii), la sélection d'une plage de valeurs à l'intérieur d'une plage plus large est nouvelle s'il est satisfait à 3 critères, dont le critère b) suivant : "la plage de valeurs limitée qui a été sélectionnée est suffisamment éloignée de tout exemple spécifique divulgué dans l'état de la technique … [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 6:19 am
In relation to reporting restrictions, the Judge made one in essentially the same form as in Re P (A Child) [2013] EWHC 4048 (Fam). [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:48 am
A or B or C ~A B or C ~B ∴C The syllogism works as a valid form of argument if the premises are all true. [read post]
