Search for: "Matter of Siegel"
Results 321 - 340
of 404
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2015, 2:08 pm
Chief Justice John Roberts, in the principal dissent, sets forth the most elaborate argument, but fundamentally he makes three points: (1) there is a difference between support for same-sex marriage as a policy matter and as a constitutional matter; (2) premature constitutionalization of a right that cannot yet be said to be deeply rooted in the nation’s history and traditions risks undermining long-term support for the right because defeat of the anti-same-sex-marriage… [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 8:43 pm
Neither the Section 8 federal rules and regulations nor the written lease between the parties gives an attorney or agent authority to bind the landlord in matters relating to termination. [read post]
27 Feb 2025, 6:51 am
These three words matter,’ Driscoll said. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 6:30 am
No one cares about the actual legal issue raised in Marbury—whether Congress can add to the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court; it is not relevant to any contemporary litigation, nor, as a matter of fact, does Marbury truly feature as the centerpiece of contemporary articles on constitutional theory, including, for that matter, the propriety of judicial review. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:56 pm
Clement was likely speaking first and foremost to Chief Justice John Roberts, who has himself emphasized the importance of maintaining the Court’s public legitimacy as a general matter and who has also expressed specific legitimacy concerns about judicial review of partisan gerrymanders.One potential response to Mr. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 5:39 am
It would as a practical matter strip President Trump’s judicial appointees (and, in the stronger form, those of President George W. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 8:47 am
Here, more than in other areas, standard of review matters enormously. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 5:25 am
(For an overview of this strategy for discouraging abortions, see Reva Siegel, The New Politics of Abortion: An Equality Analysis of Woman-Protective Abortion Restrictions, 2007 U. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 6:42 am
A pair of lobbyists connected to the matter have already pleaded guilty to misdemeanor charges. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
Most appellate courts that have recently considered the matter have so held as to libel as well. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 8:24 am
Siegel, “Preserving the Anti-Scientific Linear No-Threshold Myth: Authority, Agnosticism, Transparency, and the Standard of Care,” 15 Dose-Response: An Internat’l J. 1 (2017); Charles L. [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:06 am
Holding on Appeal The Divisional Court unanimously allowed the appeal and remitted the matter to a different motions judge for re-consideration, recognizing that the anonymous posters’ right of freedom of expression under the Charter should have been taken into account in considering the Respondent’s request for disclosure under the Rules. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 9:01 pm
”Clement, a former Solicitor General of the United States, is an excellent lawyer, so he gave the answer that best served his clients: it doesn’t matter. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 8:00 am
Suave, well-mannered criminals, like Frank Costello and Bugsy Siegel were viewed by a national audience. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 12:56 pm
Justices Scalia and Thomas would have gone even further than that, and stated in a concurring opinion that even if Salinas had invoked his right to be silent, it would not have mattered because nothing the police did required him to give self-incriminating testimony. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 8:00 am
Suave, well-mannered criminals, like Frank Costello and Bugsy Siegel were viewed by a national audience. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 12:56 pm
What matters is that the Court explicitly reasons on the basis of an evolved rationale—one maximally responsive to a modern social movement heralding a reconstructed notion of self-defense in the home. [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:04 am
Holding on Appeal The Divisional Court unanimously allowed the appeal and remitted the matter to a different motions judge for re-consideration, recognizing that the anonymous posters’ right of freedom of expression under the Charter should have been taken into account in considering the Respondent’s request for disclosure under the Rules. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 8:09 pm
" Marc Siegel, [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 7:00 am
(Disclosure: I've collaborated with Becket on several matters over the years.) [read post]
